Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bobo, 872 So. 2d 1052.

15 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Jonathan Ray Harbin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
2 4/ 30/ 04), he contends that problems encountered by the State " in extradition or those caused by its own mismanagement cannot be charged to the defendant."
State v. Barahona 192 So. 3d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
“[Ojnce a defendant asserts a facially meritorious motion to quash based on a failure to timely commence trial, the district attorney ‘bears the heavy burden’ of showing that the running of this prescriptive period was interrupted.” State v. Bobo, 2003-2362, p. 4 (La.4/30/04), (citation omitted).
State v. Stewart 176 So. 3d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court explained that this burden ordinarily “ ‘requires the State to exercise due diligence in discovering the whereabouts of the defendant as well as taking appropriate steps to secure his presence for trial once it has found him.’ ” State v. Romar, 07-2140, p. 3 (La.7/1/08), , quoting State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 5 (La.4/30/04), -56 .
State of Louisiana v. Calvin James Catalon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Thomas 138 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 4 (La.4/30/04), ().
State v. Gregory 137 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
7 State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 4 (La.4/30/04), .
State of Louisiana v. John Wesley Perry, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Perry 127 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 579_ *1068 State v. Bobo, 03-2362, pp. 4-5 (La.4/30/04), , 1055-56 & n. 2.
State v. Drummer 107 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
That burden ordinarily “requires the State to exercise due diligence in discovering the whereabouts of the defendant as well as taking appropriate steps to secure his presence for trial once it has found him.” State v. Romar, 07-2140, p. 3 (La.7/1/08), ; citing State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 5 (La.4/30/04), -56 .
State v. Williams 95 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See State v. Bobo, 03-2362, pp. 4-5, (La.4/30/04), -56 (quoting State v. Chadboume, 98-1998, p. 1 (La.1/8/99), )(noting that “ ‘[t]his heavy burden “requires the State to exercise due diligence in discovering the whereabouts of the defendant as well as taking appropriate steps to secure ' his presence for trial once it has found him.” ’ ”) For these
State v. Green 72 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
That burden ordinarily “ ‘requires the State to exercise due diligence in discovering the whereabouts of the defendant as well as taking appropriate steps to secure his presence for trial once it has found him.’ ” State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 5 (La.4/30/04), -56 (quoting Chad-bourne).
State v. Franklin 62 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Rome, 93-1221 (La.1/14/94), ; State v. Bobo, 2003-2362 (La.4/30/04), ; State v. Mattox, 96-1406 and 96-2370 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Milton Anthony Wilks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
That -1- burden ordinarily “ ‘requires the State to exercise due diligence in discovering the whereabouts of the defendant as well as taking appropriate steps to secure his presence for trial once it has found him.’ ” State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 5 (La.4/30/04), -56 (quoting Chadbourne ).
State v. Romar 985 So. 2d 722 La. 2008
That burden ordinarily "`requires the State to exercise due diligence in discovering the whereabouts of the defendant as well as taking appropriate steps to secure his presence for trial once it has found him.'" State v. Bobo, 03-2362, p. 5 (La.4/30/04), -56 (quoting Chadbourne ).
State v. McClain 966 So. 2d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by