DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite King v. Parish National Bank, 885 So. 2d 540.

133 citing documents.

  • 720 Harrison, LLC v. TEC Realtors, Inc. 82 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    STANDARD OF REVIEW: “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.Code Civ.
  • Brandon Jagneaux v. Ronald R. Frohn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Jagneaux v. Frohn 74 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Jouve v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 74 So. 3d 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 966 B. “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall Lobe construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 2004-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Mendoza v. Grey Wolf Drilling Co. 77 So. 3d 18 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Carolyn Plummer Sheridan v. Tommy Gordon Cassel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    10/19/04)], []; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.
  • Sheridan v. Cassel 70 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-0337 (La.10/19/04) ], [ ]; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Foundation Materials, Inc. v. Carrollton Mid-City Investors, L.L.C. 66 So. 3d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 8/26/09), , 515 citing King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Warren v. Kenny 64 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Mendy Properties, L.C. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. 62 So. 3d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    *775 LAW AND ANALYSIS: “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.Code Civ.
  • Frederick Kirk D/B/A Exactax v. Interface Security System, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Isadore v. Interface Security Systems 58 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], []; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Favrot v. Favrot 68 So. 3d 1099 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), .
  • Sharon Lecroy v. Byrd Regional Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of 21 Santiago, [03-1424 (La.
  • LeCroy v. Byrd Regional Hospital 56 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Gulf Coast Bank and Trust Co. v. Elmore 57 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    art. 966 C(2); see also King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, pp. 7-8 (La.10/19/04), -546 .
  • Brown v. Martin 53 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ⅛ designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 JjCLa.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Charley and Debora Steen v. Short Term Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Derrick Gabriel v. Louisiana Organ Procurement Agency La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.
  • Gabriel v. Louisiana Organ Procurement Agency 48 So. 3d 1192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07)], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04)], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04)], [.]
  • Baker v. Hurst 50 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • City of Shreveport v. SGB Architects, L.L.P. 47 So. 3d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0387 (La.10/19/04), .
  • Shane Kerry v. Charles Pearson, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    10/19/04)], Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.
  • Kerry v. Pearson 40 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, [06-1181 (La.3/9/07) ], [ ]; King v. Parish National Bank, [04-337 (La.10/19/04) ], ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, [03-1424 (La.4/14/04) ], [.]
  • Seruntine v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 38 So. 3d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    |sThe Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the applicable legal principles governing a defendant’s entitlement to summary judgment in King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337, pp. 7-8 (La.10/19/04), -46 .
  • Zumpe v. Zara's Little Giant Super Market, Inc. 35 So. 3d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 966 B. “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed | oto secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Lingoni v. Hibernia National Bank 33 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Scientific Drilling International,inc. v. Lafayette Parish School Board Sales Tax Division La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish 2 National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Scientific Drilling International, Inc. v. Meche 29 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003—1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Mitchell v. VALTEAU 30 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    art. 966 B. “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive | ^determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Mednick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 31 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Co., 08-1491 (La.4/3/09), ; King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337 (La.10/19/04), .
  • Charlotte Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.
  • Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corp. 27 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Jenkins v. Haynes 24 So. 3d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    art. 966 B. “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Keith Allen Portie v. Flavin Realty, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.
  • Portie v. Flavin [Realty] Inc. 22 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National *1146 Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Nguyen v. Weston 20 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    STANDARD OF REVIEW: “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.Code Civ.
  • Foundation Materials, Inc. v. Carrollton Mid-City Investors, L.L.C. 17 So. 3d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    DISCUSSION “Favored in Louisiana, the summary judgment procedure ‘is designed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action’ and shall be construed to accomplish these ends.” King v. Parish National Bank, 04-0337 (La.10/19/04), (quoting La.
  • Versluis v. GULF COAST TRANSIT CO. 17 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • FLETTRICH v. Touro Infirmary 13 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04- 0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), .
  • Marie Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Thomas Allen v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of 2 Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Benniefiel v. Zurich American Insurance 10 So. 3d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 [,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Allen v. Allstate Insurance Co. 10 So. 3d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181[,] p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337[,] p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003 — 1424[,] p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • GOOD ACRES, INC. v. Jemison 8 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The Louisiana Supreme Court held that a genuine issue is “an issue in which reasonable persons could disagree.” King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337 (La.10/19/04), .
  • R.I. Lucien Tile Co. ex rel. Cage v. American Security Insurance 8 So. 3d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Samaha v. Rau, 2007-1726 p. 1-2 (La.2/26/08), -883 ; Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Harry John Walsh, Jr. v. Dr. Jason Morris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, 2006-1181 p. 17 (La.3/9/07), King v. Parish National Bank, 2004-0337 p. 7 (La.10/19/04), Jones v. Estate of Santiago, 2003-1424 p. 5 (La.4/14/04)
  • Walsh v. Morris 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light, XXXX-XXXX p. 17 (La.3/9/07), ; King v. Parish National Bank, XXXX-XXXX p. 7 (La.10/19/04), ; Jones v. Estate of Santiago, XXXX-XXXX p. 5 (La.4/14/04), .
  • Warner v. Alex Enterprises, Inc. 4 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), .
  • Brooks v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 4 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    King v. Parish Nat’l Bank, 04-0337, p. 7 (La.10/19/04), .