Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 892 So. 2d 7.

62 citing documents.

Patrick Buggs v. Town of Bernice and Risk Management, Inc. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
1/19/05), Marshall v. Town of Winnsboro, 52,733 (La.
Gloria's Ranch, L.L.C. v. Tauren Exploration, Inc., Cubic Energy, Inc., Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc., and Exco USA … 252 So. 3d 431 La. 2018
Johnson v. Nw. La. War Veterans Home 246 So. 3d 681 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
01/19/05), ; Smith, supra ; Maxwell, supra.
Jackie White v. Fuel Plus, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
White v. Fuel Plus, LLC 229 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Bradley v. St. Francis Med. Ctr. 244 So. 3d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
01/19/05), ; Arrant, supra .
Smith v. Graphic Packaging, Inc. 244 So. 3d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
01/19/05), ; Maxwell, supra .
Arrant v. Wayne Acree Pls, Inc. 218 So. 3d 737 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1/19/05), ; Key v. Monroe City Sch.
Corey Lamartiniere v. Boise Cascade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Lamartiniere v. Cascade 193 So. 3d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Maxwell v. Care Solutions, Inc. 179 So. 3d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Frith v. Riverwood, 04-1086 (La.01/19/05), ; Key v. Monroe City School Board, 45,096 (La.App.2d Cir.03/10/10), ; Gasway v. Cellxion, Inc., 44,-638 (La.App.2d Cir.01/27/10), .
Lois J. Shailow v. Gulf Coast Social Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Shailow v. Gulf Coast Social Services 166 So. 3d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086, p. 11 (La.1/19/05), .
Lee v. Future Expectations Community Care Services, LLC 152 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., 2004-1086 (La.01/19/05), ; Transpetco I Joint Venture v. Clearview Investments, Ltd., 48,987 (La.App.2d Cir.05/14/14), .
Transpetco I Joint Venture v. Clearview Investments, Ltd. 139 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., 2004-1086 (La.1/19/05), ; Hollenshead v. Gemini Explorations Inc., supra.
Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 145 So. 3d 271 La. 2014
Id., 12-0659 at 10, 119 So.3d at 975 , quoting Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086, pp. 7-8 (La.1/19/05), -13 .
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. v. Wooden 132 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 2004-1086 (La.1/19/05), ; Bruno v. Harbert Intern.
Starkey v. Livingston Parish Council 122 So. 3d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 2004-1086, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 119 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[T]he general principle” is “that the law in effect at the time of the injury generally governs an action for workers’ compensation benefits.” Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086, pp. 7-8 (La.1/19/05), -13 .
Slocum v. Northlake Driveline 117 So. 3d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 2004-1086, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Cindy Colwell v. the Summit Retirement Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Colwell v. Summit Retirement Center 128 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., 04-1086 (La.1/19/05), .
Hollingsworth v. Steven Garr Logging 110 So. 3d 1219 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Roach v. Libbey Glass, Inc. 107 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086 (La.01/19/05), .
Villar v. Industrial Metal Recyclers 111 So. 3d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 2004-1086, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Lawson v. Arabie Bros. Trucking, Inc. 93 So. 3d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 2004-1086 (La.1/19/05), -13 .
Hall v. Macpapers, Inc. 95 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
In determining the factual issue of whether an employer’s actions are arbitrary and capricious, the manifest error standard of review is applied, and the crucial inquiry is “whether the employer can articulate an objective reason for discontinuing benefits at the time it took the action.” Frith v. Riverwood, 2004-1086, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Morgan v. Barber Bros. Contracting 92 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 2004-1086, p. 7 (La.1/19/05), .
Parker v. State 86 So. 3d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Stonetrust Commercial Insurance Co. v. George 81 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 2004-1086 (La.01/19/05), ; Thomas v. Hollywood Casino, 44,271 (La.App.2d Cir.05/13/09), .
Dwayne Olivier v. City of Eunice La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
1/19/05), (emphasis added).
Janet Leblanc v. Excel Auto Parts La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
1/19/05), citing Hickman v. Allstate Timber Co., 94-1275 (La.App 3 Cir. 4/5/95), writ denied, 95-1133 (La.
LeBlanc v. Excel Auto Parts 67 So. 3d 687 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Cf. Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086 (La.1/19/05), , citing Hickman v. Allstate Timber Co., 94-1275 (La.App 3 Cir. 4/5/95), , writ denied, 95-1133 (La.6/23/95), .
David Burkett v. Lfi Fort Pierce, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
In determining the factual issue of whether an employer’s actions are arbitrary and capricious, the manifest error standard of review is applied, and the crucial inquiry is “whether the employer can articulate an objective reason for discontinuing benefits at the time it took the action.” Frith v. Riverwood, 04-1086, p. 12 (La.1/19/05)
Burkett v. LFI Fort Pierce, Inc. 63 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
In determining the factual issue of whether an employer’s actions are arbitrary and capricious, the manifest error standard of review is applied, and the crucial inquiry is “whether the employer can articulate an objective reason for discontinuing benefits at the time it took the action.” Frith v. Riverwood, 04-1086, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Hollenshead Oil & Gas, LLC v. Gemini Explorations, Inc. 44 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., 2004-1086 (La.1/19/05), .
Irving v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc. 44 So. 3d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
|BIn determining the factual issue of whether an employer’s actions are arbitrary and capricious, the manifest error standard of review is applied, and the crucial inquiry is “whether the employer can articulate an objective reason for discontinuing benefits at the time it took the *800 action.” Frith v. Riverwood, 04-1086, p. 12 (La.1/19/05), .
Key v. Monroe City School Board 32 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., 2004-1086, p. 13 (La.1/19/05), ; Thomas v. Hollywood Casino, 44,271, p. 14 (La.App.
Gasway v. Cellxion, Inc. 31 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Judy Davis v. State, Thru Dotd, Office of Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/19/05), (reinstated and increased attorney fees; addressed applicability of 1990 Amendments; reversed award of permanent total disability).
Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
1/19/05), (reinstated and increased attorney fees; addressed applicability of 1990 Amendments; reversed award of permanent total disability).
Kendrick v. Solo Cup 15 So. 3d 295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., 2004-1086 (La.1/19/05), .
Thomas v. Hollywood Casino 13 So. 3d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., 2004-1086 (La.1/19/05), ; Freeman v. Chase, supra.
Am. Home Assur. Co. v. LA. WORK. COMP. SECOND INJURY BD. 991 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, pp. 7-8 (La.1/19/05), -13 .
Gardache v. New Orleans Police Dept. 977 So. 2d 891 La. 2008
Subsequently, on January 19, 2005, this Court in Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086 (La.1/19/05), , specifically overruled both Cline and Gardache I. Upon learning of the decision in Frith , plaintiff filed another disputed claim for compensation seeking SEBs on April 6, 2005.
Freeman v. Chase 974 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
Gardache v. City of New Orleans Police Dep. 974 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086 (La.1/19/05), .
Royals v. Town of Richwood 968 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Frith v. Riverwood Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/05), .
TALYOR v. JC Penney 959 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Because it is not entitled to a credit for these payments, and as the workers' compensation scheme is to be liberally construed in favor of benefits, Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086, p. 1 (La.1/19/05), (Weimer, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part), we affirm the ruling of the OWC that J.C.
Doyal v. VERNON PARISH SCHOOL BD. 950 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Frith v. Riverwood, Inc., 04-1086 (La.1/19/05), .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by