Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Winford v. Conerly Corp., 897 So. 2d 560.

90 citing documents.

Larry Burns v. Interstate Brands Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3/11/05), Vermillion Parish Police Jury v. Williams, 02-12 (La.App.
Burns v. Interstate Brands Corp. 30 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), ; Vermilion Parish Police Jury v. Williams, 02-12 (La.App.
City of Dequincy v. Randy James Henry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
CITY OF DeQUINCY v. Henry 25 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“[E]ven where the appellate court is convinced it would have weighed the evidence differently if it had been sitting as trier, the court of appeal may not reverse if the factfinder’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety.” Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278, p. 15-16 (La.3/11/05), -70 .
Judy Davis v. State, Thru Dotd, Office of Risk Management La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/11/05), -70, the supreme court set forth the standard of review as follows: It is well settled that factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
Judy Davis v. Louisiana Dept. of Transportation & Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3/11/05), -70, the supreme court set forth the standard of review as follows: It is well settled that factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
Davis v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation & Development, Office of Risk Management 27 So. 3d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278, pp. 15-16 (La.3/11/05), -70 , the supreme court set forth the standard of review as follows: It is well settled that factual findings in workers’ compensation cases are subject to the manifest error or clearly wrong standard of appellate review.
Buxton v. Iowa Police Department 23 So. 3d 275 La. 2009
Winford v. Conerly Corporation, 04-1278, p. 15 (La.3/11/05), .
Dorion v. Gulf States Asphalt Co., L.P. 14 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), .
Frye v. Olan Mills 7 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Winford v. Conerly Corporation, 2004-1278 (La.3/11/05), ; City of Shreveport v. Casciola, supra.
In Re Succession of Wagner 993 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
art. 854; Winford v. Conerly Corporation, 04-1278, p. 11 (La.3/11/05), .
Adams v. Sysco Food Service of New Orleans 990 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
In Winford v. Conerly Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/11/05), , our supreme court ruled that a developing injury does not manifest into a disability until the employee is either forced to discontinue working due to the injury or the employee *48 receives a medical diagnosis which determines that he or she is disabled.
Gilbert v. Willis-Knighton Work Kare Clinic 986 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
See Winford v. Conerly Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.03/11/05), , citing, Brown v. Travelers Ins.
City of Shreveport v. Casciola 980 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Winford v. Conerly Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/11/05), ; Brooks v. Madison Parish Service Dist.
Flach v. Diebold, Inc. 973 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), 563 .
Johnson v. UNOPENED SUCCESSION 969 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Cichirillo v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 2004-2894 (La.11/29/05), ; Winford v. Conerly Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/11/05), .
Huckaby v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. 961 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Winford v. Conerly Corporation, 2004-1278 (La.3/11/05), ; Sevin v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc., 94-1859 (La.4/10/95), .
Barnes v. Plaquemines Parish Solid Waste 961 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
...” DISCUSSION Standard of Review In Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278, p. 15-16 (La.3/11/05), -570 , the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the appellate standard of preview to be applied in workers’ compensation cases.
Brooks v. MADISON PARISH SERVICE DIST. HOS. 954 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), .
Warren A. Rave v. Wampold Companies La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Rave v. Wampold Companies 944 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
See Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), .
Hubbard v. Allied Building Stores, Inc. 942 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.03/11/05), .
Brock v. Frymasters 942 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Winford v. Conerly Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/11/05), .
Bethley v. City of New Orleans 945 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
3/11/05), ; Masinter v. Akal Sec., Inc., 05-1236, p. 3 (La.App.
Moore v. Transmissions, Inc. 940 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Winford v. Conerly Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.3/11/05), .
Warren v. ACTION OIL RECOVERY 944 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Winford v. Conerly Corporation, 04-1278, p. 5 (La.3/11/05), .
Scott Bennett v. Daigre's Automotive, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Bennett v. Daigre's Automotive, Inc. 930 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 2/1/06) , , citing La.Civ.Code art. 1853 and Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), .
Yvonne Grillette v. Alliance Compressors La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Shane Richard v. Machine Specialty & Mfg. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3/11/05), (citations omitted) (emphasis added): The jurisprudence has generally identified two situations that signify the date a developing injury was found to be disabling for the purpose of prescription.
Richard v. Machine Specialty & Mfg., Inc. 921 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
As the supreme court recognized in Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278, p. 6 (La.3/11/05), (citations omitted) (emphasis added): The jurisprudence has generally identified two situations that signify the date a developing injury was found to be disabling for the purpose of prescription.
Grillette v. Alliance Compressors 923 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
La.Civ.Code art. 1853; Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), .
Richarda D. Mesh v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
3/11/05), La.Code Civ.P.
Nestor v. LA. UNIV. HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER 917 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Winford v. Conerly Corp., XXXX-XXXX (La.03/11/05), .
Eddie Angelle v. Taylor Oilfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Mesh v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp. 918 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), ; La.Code Civ.P.
Angelle v. Taylor Oilfield 918 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 04-1278 (La.3/11/05), .
Nelson v. Motiva 928 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Winford v. Conerly Corp., 2004-1278, p. 5 (La.3/11/05), .
Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 917 So. 2d 424 La. 2005
Winford v. Conerly Corporation, 04-1278, p. 8 (La.3/11/05), .
Sheppard v. Isle of Capri 909 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Winford v. Conerly Corp, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/11/05), .