DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 908 So. 2d 1.

102 citing documents.

  • Hodges v. Reasonover 103 So. 3d 1069 La. 2012
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Peña v. Simeon 96 So. 3d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., 08-1221, p. 7 (La.3/17/09), 6 So.Bd 179,188; Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05)
  • Jasper Contractors, Inc. v. E-Claim.com, LLC 94 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    13 Furthermore, the Louisiana Supreme Court subsequently held in Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 2004-2804, p. 8 (La.6/29/05), , that the United States Supreme Court has made it clear that whether a claim is brought in state or federal court, and whether a claim arises out of state or federal law, courts must enforce arbitration agreements in contracts covered by the FAA, notwithstanding any state statutory or jurisprudential rules to the
  • Keyclick Outsourcing, Inc. v. Ochsner Health Plan, Inc. 89 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
    Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857, p. 6 (La.6/29/05), .
  • A & A Mechanical, Inc. v. Satterfield & Pontikes Construction Group, LLC 83 So. 3d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857, p. 6 (La.6/29/05), ; Dufrene v. HBOS Mfg., LP, 2003-2201, pp. 7-8 (La.App.
  • Bolden v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. 60 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    siana Supreme Court, in Aguil-lard v. Auction Management Corp., adopted the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of federal arbitration law, Innoting that “even when the scope of an arbitration clause is fairly debatable or reasonably in doubt, the court should decide the question of construction in favor of arbitration.” Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, p. 25 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Regions Bank v. Weber 53 So. 3d 1284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, pp. 6-8 (La.6/29/05), -8 .
  • Johnson v. 1425 Dauphine, L.L.C. 52 So. 3d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The intermediate appellate courts’ authority for that statement is supposedly derived from Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Bossier Parish Police Jury v. Walton Construction Co. 56 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 2004-2804 (La.6/29/05), ; Long v. Jeb Breithaupt Design Build, 44,002 (La.App.
  • Prasad v. Bullard 51 So. 3d 35 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, pp. 24-25 (La.6/29/05), .
  • BARKLEY ESTATE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Huskey 30 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    2 Cir. 8/23/06), , citing Aguil-lard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.06/29/05), (Aguillard questioned on other grounds as stated in Arkel Constructors, Inc. v. Duplantier & Meric, Architects, L.L.C., 06-1950 (La.
  • Charlotte Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Broussard v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corp. 27 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/07), .
  • O'Neal v. Total Car Franchising Corp. 27 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Under these circumstances, the agreement “is not susceptible of an interpretation that could cover the dispute at issue.” Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.06/29/05), .
  • Jason Vidrine, Et Ux. v. J & J Exterminating Company Ofalexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    One of the conditions of a valid contract is consent of both parties.” (La.
  • Vidrine v. J & J Exterminating Co. of Alexandria 20 So. 3d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/05), , federal law concerning arbitration clauses preempts state law.
  • Casares v. James M. Brown Builder, Inc. 17 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    927 , 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983); Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04—2804 (La.06/29/05), .
  • Darryl W. Richard v. Leanna Marie Glaude La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    6/29/05), the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that a party is deemed to know the contents of a signed, written instrument and cannot avoid his or her obligations by claiming he or she did not read it or was not aware of its contents: The Civil Code recognizes the right of individuals to freely contr
  • Richard v. Glaude 10 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, p. 16 (La.6/29/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that a party is deemed to know the contents of a signed, written instrument and cannot avoid his or her obligations by claiming he or she did not read it or was not aware of its contents: The Civil Code recognizes the right of individuals to freely contract.
  • Bradstreet v. Kinchen 10 So. 3d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 2004-2804, p. 9 (La.6/29/05), -9 .
  • Explained Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. 6 So. 3d 179 La. 2009
    In Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), , we explained that a party who signs a written agreement is presumed to know its contents: The Civil Code recognizes the right of individuals to freely contract.
  • Nco Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Mary Walker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • NCO PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, INC. v. Walker 3 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/05), .
  • CHASE BANK USA, NA v. Leggio 999 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    834 , 130 L.Ed.2d 753 (1995); Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/05), .
  • CHASE BANK USA, NA v. Leggio 997 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    834 , 130 L.Ed.2d 753 (1995); Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Pennington v. Cuna Brokerage Securities, Inc. 5 So. 3d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 2004-2804, 2004-2857 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of La v. Philip Morris, USA, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Ieyoub v. Philip Morris, USA, Inc. 982 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    9:4201; Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/05), .
  • NCO Portfolio Management Inc. v. Gougisha 985 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    In Aguillard v. Auctions Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court directly addressed the applicability of an arbitration clause which was contained in a printed form prepared by a party with superior bargaining power.
  • FIA CARD SERVICES, NA v. Gibson 978 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corporation, 2004-2804 (La.6/29/05), ; Broussard v. Compulink Business Systems, Inc., 41,276 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/06), .
  • Limousine Livery v. a AIRPORT LIM. SERVICE 980 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857, pp. 25-26 (La.6/29/05), (noting that "[d]ue to the similarities between our state arbitration provisions and the federal arbitration law [(the FAA)] .
  • Bayou Fleet Partnership v. PHILLIP FAMILY 976 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    NOTES [1] In Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, p. 9 (La.6/29/05), -9 , the Louisiana Supreme Court defined a contract of adhesion as: ".
  • Sutton Steel & Supply v. Bellsouth Mobility 971 So. 2d 1257 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Rather, the gravamen of the defendants' argument here challenges the validity of the class certification—i.e., whether the suit at issue may continue in the form of a class action at all—in light of the allegedly controlling jurisprudence of Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), , a case which emerged subsequent to the trial court's initial class certification ruling.
  • Sutton Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Bellsouth Mobility, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    6/29/05), a case which emerged subsequent to the trial court’s initial class certification ruling.
  • Arkel Constructors v. Duplantier & Meric 965 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    The supreme court reiterated that holding in Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857, p. 5 n. 5 (La.6/29/05), , 6 n. 5: "A judgment denying a request for arbitration has been held to be an appealable, interlocutory order."
  • Chad Easterling v. Royal Manufactured Housing, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    6/29/05), stated that the positive law of Louisiana favors arbitration, and that this favorable treatment echos the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) at 9 U.S.C.
  • Easterling v. ROYAL MANUFACTURED HOUSING 963 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Quoting the Louisiana and federal statutes above, the Louisiana Supreme Court in Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857 (La.6/29/05), , stated that the positive law of Louisiana favors arbitration, and that this favorable treatment echos the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") at 9 U.S.C.
  • Lamarque v. BARBARA ENTERPRISES, INC. 958 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, p. 22 (La.6/29/05), .
  • LaFleur v. Law Offices of Anthony G. Buzbee 960 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    See Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Allen v. Valero Energy Corp. 951 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804, p. 8 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Ganier v. Inglewood Homes, Inc. 944 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Crystal Smith v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    6/29/05), ], a case that encourages the upholding of binding arbitration agreements.
  • Broussard v. Compulink Business Systems 939 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.06/29/05), .
  • Clark A. Gunderson, M.D. v. F. A. Richard & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    6/29/05), (citing Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265, 115 S.Ct.
  • Gunderson v. FA RICHARD & ASSOCIATES 937 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Corp., 04-2804, p. 8 (La.6/29/05), (citing Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265 , 115 S.Ct.
  • HOFFMAN, SIEGEL, SEYDEL, BIENVENU v. Lee 936 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    In Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp. 2004-2804 (La.6/29/05), , the plaintiffs were patrons of an auction house.
  • Vishal Hospitality v. Choice Hotels Intern. 939 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    McCLENDON, J. This matter comes to us on remand from the Louisiana Supreme Court following its decision in Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Ellis Const. v. Vieux Carre Resort Propert. 934 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Corp., 04-2804, 04-2857, p. 6 (La.6/29/05); .
  • Horseshoe Entertainment v. Lepinski 923 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), .
  • Johnson v. Blue Haven Pools of Louisiana, Inc. 928 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    [1] LAW AND ANALYSIS At the outset, we recognize a recent case, Aguillard v. Auction Management Corp., 04-2804 (La.6/29/05), -8 , wherein the Louisiana supreme court observed that the positive law of Louisiana favors arbitration, and any doubt concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration.