Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite McKenzie v. Cuccia, 879 So. 2d 335.

18 citing documents.

Jillian Duran v. George Silva, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Rob's Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 6/23/04), (citing Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
429 Bourbon Street, LLC v. RMDR Investments, Inc. 230 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 6/23/04), (citation omitted).
Brown v. Chategnier 208 So. 3d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hilkirk v. Johnson 183 So. 3d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 6/23/04), ); Orrill v. Orrill, 08-0400, p. 3 (La.
Moreau v. Moreau 179 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 6/23/04), (citing Collins v. Collins, 36,629 (La.App.
Wilson v. Wilson 170 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 6/23/04) , , citing Thompson v. Thompson, 88-1477 (La.10/14/88), ; Foshee v. Foshee, 12-1358 (La.App.
Hanks v. Hanks 140 So. 3d 208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/23/04), (); Foshee v. Foshee, 12-1358, p. 4 (La.App.
Foshee v. Foshee 123 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Molony v. Harris 60 So. 3d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Bridges v. Bridges 33 So. 3d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 6/23/04), ; Stephenson v. Stephenson, 37,323, p. 4 (La.App.
Penn v. Penn 28 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 6/23/04), (noting the deference granted to the fact-finder on appellate review extends to its assessment of expert testimony).
Watts v. Watts 10 So. 3d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Schmidt v. Schmidt 6 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 6/23/04), , 338 Gill v. Dufréne, 97-0777 (La.App.
Palazzolo v. Mire 10 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Kees v. Kees 992 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 6/23/04), , this Court discussed the standard of review in child custody matters, stating: An appellate court may not set aside a trial court's finding of fact in the absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong."
Richardson v. Richardson 974 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Zimko v. American Cyanamid 905 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
4 Cir. 6/23/04), (noting the deference granted to the fact-finder on appellate review extends to its assessment of expert testimony).