Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Katz v. Allstate Ins. Co., 917 So. 2d 443.

29 citing documents.

Titus v. Wilson 186 So. 3d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Wilson v. Doe 182 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
Oliver v. Orleans Parish School Board 133 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Ansardi v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 111 So. 3d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/2/05) , , wherein she wrote: [[t]he mover] cites federal district court cases from various jurisdictions which, hold that a plaintiff who files an independent action before a determination on class certification has been made cannot benefit from the tolling of prescription applicable to putative class members under federal la
Clotworthy v. Scaglione 95 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir.2/2/05), (factual conclusions of trial court reviewed under manifest error-clearly wrong standard).
Friel v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance 85 So. 3d 180 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2012
Duckworth v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 78 So. 3d 835 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 2/2/05) , , and Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 09-1105 (La.App.
Brown v. Schreiner 81 So. 3d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Richard v. Richard 74 So. 3d 1156 La. 2011
4 Cir. 2/2/05) , ; Smith v. Slattery, 38,693 (La.App.2d Cir.6/23/04), , writ denied, 04-1860 (La.10/29/04), .
Barcia v. Louisiana Medical Malpractice Insurance Co. 67 So. 3d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Taranto v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 62 So. 3d 721 La. 2011
4 Cir. 2/2/05) , , which held that the filing of a class action does not alter a valid contractual prescriptive period.
Amos v. ROOMS TO GO LOUISIANA CORP. 43 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/2/05), (citing Davis v. Hibernia National Bank, 98-1164 (La.App.
Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 42 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 2/2/05) , , and Calvello v. Electronic Data Systems, 2004 WL 941809 (W.D.N.Y.4/15/04), (not reported in F.Supp.2d.).
Mwd Services, Inc. v. Anthony Humphries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
MWD SERVICES, INC. v. Humphries 26 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Burg v. LIVING CENTERS EAST INC. 28 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Bell v. Glaser 16 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 2/2/05) , ; Parker v. B & K Const. Co., Inc., 2006-1465 (La.App.
GETTRIDGE v. Orleans Parish School Board 10 So. 3d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Babin v. Babin 10 So. 3d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Pitts v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 4 So. 3d 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 2/2/05), , prevents a class action from interrupting a contractual prescriptive period.
Hammell v. GICILI 978 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Parker v. B & K CONST. CO., INC. 962 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Lloyd ex rel. Legaux v. Williams ex rel. Williams 959 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
ELEVATING BOATS v. Parish of Plaquemines 953 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/2/05), , citing Security Ctr.
Matranga v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 948 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/2/05), , this Court reiterated the standard of review for a peremptory exception of prescription as follows: “[i]n reviewing a peremptory exception of prescription, an appellate court will review the entire record to determine whether the trial court’s finding of fact was manifestly erroneous.
In Re Jenkins 945 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 2/2/05), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/29/05), .
Acorn Community Land Ass'n of Louisiana v. Zeno 936 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
ACORN COMMUNITY LAND ASS'N OF LA. v. Zeno 936 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006