Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bailey v. Khoury, 891 So. 2d 1268.

100 citing documents.

Alexander v. Medical Staffing Network, Inc. 166 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Titus, supra; Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Tenorio v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 170 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05); , citing Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.
Watson v. Glenwood Regional Medical Center 163 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
She shows that prescription statutes must be strictly construed against prescription and in favor of the claim, Bailey v. Khoury, 2004-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Robert v. Robert Management Co. 164 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
In Re: Medical Review Panel Claim of Don Clayton Wright, Et Ux. v. Christus Health Center Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
1/20/05), (quoting Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., and Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.
Medical Review Panel Claim of Wright v. Christus Health Center Louisiana 157 So. 3d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
and (2) the date on which the ‘tortious act actually produces damages.’” Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 24 (La.1/20/05), (quoting Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc., and Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), ).
Kelley v. General Insurance Co. of America 168 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Bailey v. Khoury, 2004-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Tenesha Smith v. Transport Services Company of Illinois 148 So. 3d 903 La. 2014
Corp., 10-0105, p. 5 (La.3/15/11), ); Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Williams v. Thompson 145 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Finally, they submit that prescriptive statutes must be narrowly construed against prescription and in favor of the claim, Bailey v. Khoury, 2004-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Raborn v. Albea 144 So. 3d 1066 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Guillot v. Doughty 142 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Bailey v. Khoury, 040620 (La.1/20/05), .
McKenzie v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 122 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2013
Bailey v. Khoury, 2004-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Williams v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Co. 115 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-620, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Kenneth Forrestier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Forrestier 112 So. 3d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ; Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Watters v. Department of Social Services 102 So. 3d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
[IJiberative prescription of |16one year generally begins to run when the victim knows or should know of the damage, the delict and the relationship between them.” Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, 04-0647, 04-0684 (La.1/20/05), -1276 .
St. Tammany Parish Hospital v. Trinity Marine Products, Inc. 91 So. 3d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
See Reggio v. E.T.I., 07-1433 (La.12/12/08), ; Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), (La.
Jenkins v. Starns 85 So. 3d 612 La. 2012
ich a reasonable man in the position of the plaintiff has, or should have, either actual or constructive *621 knowledge of the damage, the | ^delict, and the relationship between them sufficient to indicate to a reasonable person he is the victim of a tort and to state a cause of action against the defendant.” 07-1384 at 12, ; See Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 9 (La.1/20/05); (interpreting the discovery rule as contained in the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act).
Ebinger v. Venus Construction Corp. 65 So. 3d 1279 La. 2011
In support of this proposition, Venus cites our discussion of libera-tive prescription in Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), (explaining that prescription “generally begins to run when the victim knows or should know of the damage, the delict and the relationship between them.”).
Dugas v. Thompson 71 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, 04-0647, 04-0684, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Taranto v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp. 62 So. 3d 721 La. 2011
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Farber v. Bobear 56 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Generally, prescription statutes are strictly construed against prescription and in favor of the claim sought to be extinguished by it.” Bailey v. Khoury, 2004-0620, 2004-0647, 2004-0684, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Miller v. Tulane University Hospital 38 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 6 (La.1/20/05), .
Titus v. IHOP RESTAURANT, INC. 25 So. 3d 761 La. 2009
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Toomer v. A-1 FENCE & PATIO, INC. 29 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-620 (La.1/20/05), .
Toomer v. A-1 Fence & Patio, Inc. 29 So. 3d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-620 (La.1/20/05), .
JOINT UNDER. OF AUDUBON INS. CO. v. Johnson 20 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
Bailey v. Khoury, XXXX-XXXX, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Louisiana Joint Underwriters of Audubon Insurance v. Johnson 20 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Bailey v. Khoury, 2004-0602, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co. 21 So. 3d 186 La. 2009
dical malpractice case involving the propounding of interrogatories and exceptions of vagueness or no cause of action); Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, pp. 8-10 (La.6/21/02), -09 (medical malpractice claim brought well within three years from the date of the act of malpractice; directly quoting Hebert in its interpretation of provision); Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 8-9 (La.1/20/05), (malpractice suit Hied within a year of child's birth, well within three years from the act of malpractice); White v.
Reggio v. E.T.I. 15 So. 3d 951 La. 2008
In Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), , this Court held that “[pjrescription cannot run against a cause of action that has not accrued or while |nthat cause of action cannot be exercised.” ().
RAMELLI GROUP v. City of New Orleans 997 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, 04-0647, 04-0684, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Lila, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London 994 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Borel v. Young 989 So. 2d 42 La. 2008
Gov't., 06-2227 (La.2/22/07), ; Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, pp. 9-10 (La.1/20/05), ; State Bd.
Wilburn v. SUMMIT HOSPITAL 986 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 974 So. 2d 1266 La. 2008
See generally, Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), (interpreting the discovery rule as contained in the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act); Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), (interpreting the discovery rule as contained in the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act).
Brumfield v. McElwee 976 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, 04-0647, 04-0684, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Ramirez v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. 971 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-620 (La.1/20/05), .
Diana Sue Ramirez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-620 (La.1/20/05)
Wimberly v. Brown 973 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-620, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
DOMINION EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION v. Waters 972 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, 04-0647, 04-0684, p. 10 (La.1/20/05), , citing Campo v. Correa, 01-2702, p. 11 (La.6/21/02), .
Mallett v. McNeal 939 So. 2d 1254 La. 2006
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Teche Financial Services, Inc. v. State of Louisiana, Department of Public Safety, Office of Motor Vehicles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Teche Financial Services, Inc. v. State, Department of Public Safety, Office of Motor Vehicles 939 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
In paragraph 9 of its petition, Teche alleges the State was “negligent, reckless and/or intentionally frauded [sic] the plaintiff.” “Under Louisiana law, for a negligence cause of action to accrue, three elements are required: fault, causation and damages.” Bailey v. Khoury, 04-620, p. 9 (La.1/20/05), .
Babineaux v. DOTD 927 So. 2d 1121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), , citing Campo v. Correa, 01-2707 (La.6/21/02), .
Waldrop v. Hurd 907 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
Ascension School Emp. Credit Union v. Psha 916 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
40:1299.47; Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620 (La.1/20/05), .
In Re Evans 906 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 11 (La.1/20/05), , citing Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 11 (La.6/21/02), .
In Re: Ella Evans La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Further, prescription begins to run when a plaintiff has “actual or constructive knowledge of facts indicating to a reasonable person that he or she is the victim of a tort.” Bailey v. Khoury, 04-0620, p. 11 (La.1/20/05), citing Campo v. Correa, 01-2707, p. 11 (La.6/21/02)
Abels v. General Motors Corp. 899 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Bailey v. Khoury, XXXX-XXXX (La.01/20/05), .
Cox v. Gaylord Container Corp. 897 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Although the Louisiana Supreme Court has recently recognized the right of a plaintiff to maintain an independent cause of action for prenatal injuries sustained as a result of the negligence of a third party, see Bailey v. Khoury , XXXX-XXXX (La.1/20/05), , there is nothing in our statutes or case law that addresses the right of a child to maintain a cause of action against his or her mother for negligent infliction of prenatal injuries.