Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 916 So. 2d 1015.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. David W. Lupton, III La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
    11/29/05), and State v. Jones, 05- 0226 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rolando Anthony Massingill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
  • State v. Carr 256 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Jose Isreal Ayala, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Ayala 244 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Baptiste 209 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Williams 207 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • State ex rel. Thomas v. State 201 So. 3d 232 La. 2016
  • State ex rel. Nicholas v. State 192 So. 3d 729 La. 2016
    See State v. Jackson, 04-2863, pp. 14-15 (La.11/29/05), .
  • State ex rel. Wyatt v. State 183 So. 3d 1282 La. 2016
    art. 487; see also State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
  • State of Louisiana v. William J. Graham 180 So. 3d 271 La. 2015
    11/29/05), (finding that aggravated assault with a firearm is not a lesser and included grade of the offense of attempted first degree murder because ―assault by firearm .
  • State v. Augustine 170 So. 3d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    State v. Jackson, 04-2863, pp. 14-15 (La.11/29/05), .
  • State v. Gayton 158 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See also State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05); (wherein a guilty plea to a charge non-responsive to that charged in the bill of information is not invalidated due to the failure of the district attorney to amend the bill of information).
  • State v. Reed 167 So. 3d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    6 See State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), -23 (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the state’s failure to amend a bill of indictment to reflect a non-responsive crime, to which the defendant pled guilty, does not automatically invalidate a knowing and voluntary guilty plea.)
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Cox 134 So. 3d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    In State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05); , the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically found that a trial judge has jurisdiction to accept a defendant’s informed and voluntary guilty plea to a crime that is not responsive to the crime charged in the bill of information regardless of whether the district attorney amends the bill of information to conform t
  • State v. Hill 131 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Angelle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    11/29/05), this court explained in pertinent part: A defendant, with the consent of the district attorney, may plead guilty to a lesser offense that is included in the offense charged in the indictment.
  • State v. Angelle 124 So. 3d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    3 Cir.1984), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), , this court explained in pertinent part: A defendant, with the consent of the district attorney, may plead guilty to a lesser offense that is included in the offense charged in the indictment.
  • State v. Williams 112 So. 3d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
    State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
  • State v. Wiltz 28 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    5 Cir. 10/28/08) , ; State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
  • State v. Major 1 So. 3d 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    In State v. Jackson, 04-2863, p. 11 (La.11/29/05), (), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that a bill of information meets the constitutional requirement of informing the accused of the nature and cause of the accusation against him if it contains all of the essential elements of the crime charged in sufficient
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Leroy Bailey, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. Bailey 984 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Taylor 975 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    The Louisiana Supreme Court cases of State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), (guilty plea to a crime that was not responsive to the crime charged in the bill of information), and State v. Jones, 05-0226 (La.2/22/06), (conviction returned by an improper configuration of jurors) signal a recent change of direction for the appellate courts regarding defects in the proceedings as "er
  • State v. Langley 958 So. 2d 1160 La. 2007
    See State v. Jackson, 2004-2863, p. 11 (La.11/29/05), ("Prosecution was properly commenced by valid bill of information that informed the accused of the nature of the charges against him and therefore jurisdiction was proper.").
  • State v. Price 952 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    For example, in State v. Jackson, 2004-2863 (La.11/29/05), , the court reviewed an appellate court's decision reversing a conviction after its patent error inspection revealed that the trial court had accepted a guilty plea to a crime that was not responsive to the crime charged in the bill of information.
  • State v. Jones 935 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Jackson, 2004-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Dashawn D. Herron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    11/29/05), and argued against Defendant’s motion at the January 4, 2006 hearing.
  • State v. Herron 930 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    The prosecution deviated from the agreement based on the recent Louisiana Supreme Court decision in State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), and argued against Defendant’s motion at the January 4, 2006 hearing.
  • State v. Doussan 924 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Jackson, 04-2863, p. 8 (La.11/29/05), So.2d 1015, 1022-1023 .
  • State v. Lemon 923 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    However, in the recent case of State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the trial court is not without jurisdiction to accept a defendant's knowing and voluntary guilty plea simply because the plea is not responsive to that charged in the bill of information and the district attorney has not amended the bill to conform to the plea.