Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 916 So. 2d 1015.
-
State of Louisiana v. David W. Lupton, III
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
11/29/05), and State v. Jones, 05- 0226 (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Rolando Anthony Massingill La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
- State v. Carr 256 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- State of Louisiana v. Jose Isreal Ayala, III La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
- State v. Ayala 244 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
- State v. Baptiste 209 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Williams 207 So. 3d 552 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
- State ex rel. Thomas v. State 201 So. 3d 232 La. 2016
-
State ex rel. Nicholas v. State
192 So. 3d 729
La. 2016
See State v. Jackson, 04-2863, pp. 14-15 (La.11/29/05), .
-
State ex rel. Wyatt v. State
183 So. 3d 1282
La. 2016
art. 487; see also State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
-
State of Louisiana v. William J. Graham
180 So. 3d 271
La. 2015
11/29/05), (finding that aggravated assault with a firearm is not a lesser and included grade of the offense of attempted first degree murder because ―assault by firearm .
-
State v. Augustine
170 So. 3d 1123
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Jackson, 04-2863, pp. 14-15 (La.11/29/05), .
-
State v. Gayton
158 So. 3d 955
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See also State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05); (wherein a guilty plea to a charge non-responsive to that charged in the bill of information is not invalidated due to the failure of the district attorney to amend the bill of information).
-
State v. Reed
167 So. 3d 857
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
6 See State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), -23 (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court found that the state’s failure to amend a bill of indictment to reflect a non-responsive crime, to which the defendant pled guilty, does not automatically invalidate a knowing and voluntary guilty plea.)
- State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
- State of Louisiana v. Terrance Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
State v. Cox
134 So. 3d 74
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05); , the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically found that a trial judge has jurisdiction to accept a defendant’s informed and voluntary guilty plea to a crime that is not responsive to the crime charged in the bill of information regardless of whether the district attorney amends the bill of information to conform t
-
State v. Hill
131 So. 3d 354
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Angelle
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
11/29/05), this court explained in pertinent part: A defendant, with the consent of the district attorney, may plead guilty to a lesser offense that is included in the offense charged in the indictment.
-
State v. Angelle
124 So. 3d 1247
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 Cir.1984), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), , this court explained in pertinent part: A defendant, with the consent of the district attorney, may plead guilty to a lesser offense that is included in the offense charged in the indictment.
-
State v. Williams
112 So. 3d 1022
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
-
State v. Wiltz
28 So. 3d 554
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 10/28/08) , ; State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
-
State v. Major
1 So. 3d 715
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In State v. Jackson, 04-2863, p. 11 (La.11/29/05), (), the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that a bill of information meets the constitutional requirement of informing the accused of the nature and cause of the accusation against him if it contains all of the essential elements of the crime charged in sufficient
- State of Louisiana v. Joseph Leroy Bailey, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Bailey
984 So. 2d 267
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), ; (La.App.
-
State v. Taylor
975 So. 2d 10
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
The Louisiana Supreme Court cases of State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), (guilty plea to a crime that was not responsive to the crime charged in the bill of information), and State v. Jones, 05-0226 (La.2/22/06), (conviction returned by an improper configuration of jurors) signal a recent change of direction for the appellate courts regarding defects in the proceedings as "er
-
State v. Langley
958 So. 2d 1160
La. 2007
See State v. Jackson, 2004-2863, p. 11 (La.11/29/05), ("Prosecution was properly commenced by valid bill of information that informed the accused of the nature of the charges against him and therefore jurisdiction was proper.").
-
State v. Price
952 So. 2d 112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
For example, in State v. Jackson, 2004-2863 (La.11/29/05), , the court reviewed an appellate court's decision reversing a conviction after its patent error inspection revealed that the trial court had accepted a guilty plea to a crime that was not responsive to the crime charged in the bill of information.
-
State v. Jones
935 So. 2d 323
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Jackson, 2004-2863 (La.11/29/05), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Dashawn D. Herron
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
11/29/05), and argued against Defendant’s motion at the January 4, 2006 hearing.
-
State v. Herron
930 So. 2d 201
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
The prosecution deviated from the agreement based on the recent Louisiana Supreme Court decision in State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), and argued against Defendant’s motion at the January 4, 2006 hearing.
-
State v. Doussan
924 So. 2d 333
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Jackson, 04-2863, p. 8 (La.11/29/05), So.2d 1015, 1022-1023 .
-
State v. Lemon
923 So. 2d 794
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
However, in the recent case of State v. Jackson, 04-2863 (La.11/29/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the trial court is not without jurisdiction to accept a defendant's knowing and voluntary guilty plea simply because the plea is not responsive to that charged in the bill of information and the district attorney has not amended the bill to conform to the plea.