Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Scott, 913 So. 2d 843.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gerard Ladmirault La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 7/27/05), the defendant complained his statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial were violated.
State v. Pierre 192 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Martin 141 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Anderson 132 So. 3d 1265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State of Louisiana v. Ernest D'Wayne Derryberry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 7/27/05), writ denied, 06-822 (La.
State v. Jones 107 So. 3d 1285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , ; State v. Santiago, 2003-0693 (La.App.
State v. Mathews 109 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , ; State v. Santiago, 03-0693 (La.App.
State v. Bell 106 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 7/27/05), ; see also State v. Williams, 11-0946, p. 9 (La.App.
State v. Sanders 104 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Brown 88 So. 3d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Sorden 45 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 7/27/05), ; State v. Henderson, supra, 775 So.2d at 1142 .
State v. Kitchens 35 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , ; State v. Santiago, 2003-0693 (La.App.
State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State ex rel. L.L. 23 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 7/27/05), , 849: In State v. Frank, 99-0553, p. 21 (La.1/14/01), -20 , the Louisiana Supreme Court enunciated a three-part standard for reviewing incomplete record claims.
State v. Ervin 9 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. COMADORE 984 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , , writ denied, 06-0822 (La.10/13/06), .
State v. Chisolm 983 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , , writ denied, 06-0822 (La.10/13/06), stated that "[t]he jurisprudence, however, has recognized that this authority may be overborne under the circumstances of any given case by the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial."
State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 7/27/05), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/13/06), , this Court summarized the law relating to the issue of an excessive sentence: Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 provides that "No law shall subject any person .
State v. Gibson 971 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , , writ denied, 06-0822 (La.10/13/06), , stated that "[t]he jurisprudence, however, has recognized that this authority may be overborne under the circumstances of any given case by the defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial."
State v. Scott 958 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , , writ denied, 06-0822 (La.10/13/06), .
State v. Shanklin 953 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , , writ denied, 06-0822 (La.10/13/06), .
State v. Williams 951 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Dees 950 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 7/27/05) , , writ denied, State ex rel.
State v. Bias 947 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Love, 00-3847 (La.5/23/03), ; State v. Scott, 04-1142 (La.App: 4 Cir. 7/27/05), .
State v. Millet 946 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Brown 937 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
4 Cir. 7/27/05), ; State v. Henderson, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.App.
State v. Hill 931 So. 2d 1146 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
App. 4 Cir. 7/27/05), ; and State v. Batiste, 04-1200 (La.App.
State v. Brown 929 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006