Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Cunningham, 903 So. 2d 1110.

38 citing documents.

State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.H. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State v. McIntosh 275 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
6/13/05), , 1119 ; State v. Queen, 2009-1373 (La.
Roy Anderson Corp. v. 225 Baronne Complex, L.L.C. 251 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Colby 244 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
6/13/05), ; State v. Clark , 47,424 (La.
State v. Brown 205 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Cavalier 171 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200, p. 17 (La.6/13/05), (reversing the lower court’s finding that notice and demand statutes were unconstitutional).
Tracy Bowie v. Westside Habilitation Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
In statutory interpretation, we are also mindful that “courts must endeavor to give an interpretation that will give them effectiveness and purpose, rather than one which makes them meaningless.” State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, pp. 8-9 (La.6/13/05)
Bowie v. Westside Habilitation Center 150 So. 3d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
In statutory interpretation, we are also mindful that “courts must endeavor to give an interpretation that will give them effectiveness and purpose, rather than one which makes them meaningless.” State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, pp. 8-9 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. Hayes 108 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
3 In State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that La.
State v. Simmons 78 So. 3d 743 La. 2012
In doing so, the court of appeal acknowledged that this Court, State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), , the First Circuit, State v. Beauchamp, 10-0451 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Luke Matthew Bivens La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/13/05), the supreme court considered the constitutionality of La.R.S.
State v. Bivens 74 So. 3d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
art. 841(A), which provides: “An irregularity or error cannot be availed of after verdict unless it was objected to at the time of occurrence.” Additionally, the court noted: In State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), , the supreme court considered the constitutionality of La.R.S.
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
State of Louisiana v. Lester Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.6/13/05)
State v. Simmons 67 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. Dukes 57 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. Beauchamp 49 So. 3d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.6/13/05), , theJLou-isiana Supreme Court held that the statutory scheme set forth in La.
State v. Kroner 10 So. 3d 1231 La. 2009
15:500, defendant may contest those findings by requesting a subpoena for the criminalist, see State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, p. 18 (La.6/13/05), (“The defendant can satisfy the good-faith requirement [of La.R.S.
State ex rel. J.S. 6 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
See State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, p. 17 (La.6/13/05), , wherein the Supreme Court held that a defendant merely has to subpoena the person who performed the examination or analysis of the evidence.
State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, p. 8 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. Robbins 979 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. Savoie 982 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), , the supreme court considered the constitutionality of La.R.S.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOSEPH THOMAS SAVOIE AKA JOSEPH TOMMY SAVOIE AKA JOSEPH THOMAS SAVOY La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/13/05), the supreme court considered the constitutionality of La.R.S.
State v. Buckenberger 984 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUND 986 So. 2d 1 La. 2008
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, pp. 8-9 (La.6/13/05)
State v. Pearson 975 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, p. 9 (La.6/13/05), .
State in the Interest of C.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/13/05), -21 (footnotes omitted).
State ex rel. C.D. 971 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, pp. 4-18 (La.6/13/05), -21 (footnotes omitted).
State Ex Rel. Cd 971 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200, pp. 4-18 (La.6/13/05), -21 (footnotes omitted).
State v. Hines 970 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHARLES GREGORY ANDRUS, AKA ROBERT CHARLES ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES GEORGE ANDRUS, AKA CHARLES SAM … La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/13/05), where the supreme court considered the constitutionality of La.R.S.
State v. Russell 966 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. DERKINS 966 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
State v. Cunningham, 04-2200 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. Spears 940 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 *141 (La.6/13/05), .
State v. All Prop. and Cas. Ins. Carriers 937 So. 2d 313 La. 2006
State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 p. 8-9 (La.6/13/05), ; (La.
State v. Wright 931 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.06/13/05), .
State v. Jarreau 921 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
See, e.g., State v. Cunningham, 2004-2200 (La.6/13/05), (Johnson, J., dissenting), where Justice Johnson stated that “[w]e know from experience that public defenders are overworked and assigned hundreds of cases” and “have limited staff for investigation and fewer financial resources.” where the Supreme Court said tha