Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Stewart, 909 So. 2d 636.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Pike 273 So. 3d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    App. 4 Cir. 6/29/05), , 639, writ denied , 06-0029 (La.
  • State v. Bibbins 258 So. 3d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 6/29/05), , 641.
  • State v. Moffett 247 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 6/29/05), , 639(citations omitted).
  • State v. Hawkins 219 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , when a defendant disputes identity, “the State must negate any reasonable probability of mis-identification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia.” (Citations omitted).
  • State v. Falgout 198 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , when a defendant disputes identity, “the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia.” (citations omitted).
  • State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Sandifer 195 So. 3d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , 639: |iaWhen identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia [ 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lambert 191 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Aguillard 158 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Spencer 151 So. 3d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), ); See also State v. Mathieu, 07-0204, p. 16 (La.App.
  • State v. Small 147 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Laneheart 135 So. 3d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State v. Carter 131 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/29/05) , ; State v. Rodriguez, 2000-0519 (La.App.
  • State v. Dussett 126 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), (“When identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Cooper 120 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Veal 116 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , this Court set forth the standard for determining whether the evidence was sufficient to prove identity as the perpetrator: When identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 119307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. McCarthy 112 So. 3d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 6/29/05) , ; State v. Rodriguez, 2000-0519 (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 147 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Winston 100 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 6/29/05) , ; State v. Rodriguez, 2000-0519 (La.App.
  • State v. Lewis 95 So. 3d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 6/29/05); , writ denied
  • State v. Paul 90 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    App. 4 Cir. 6/29/05), , this Court discussed the sufficiency standard to be employed when a defendant disputes proof of identity: When identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia [ 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , 639: When identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jones 51 So. 3d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , 639: When identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its *832 burden under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Nix 987 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , this Court discussed the sufficiency standard to be employed when a defendant disputes proof of identity: When identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Mathieu 980 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 6/29/05), , writ denied, 06-0029 (La.6/2/06), : When identity is disputed, the State must negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to satisfy its burden under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Boyd 972 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007