Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Turner v. State, 906 So. 2d 399.
- State of Louisiana v. Christopher Raymond Diano La. 2025
-
State of Louisiana in the Interest of M.H.
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
6/29/05), State v. Gutweiler, 06-2596 (La.
- State Of Louisiana v. Christine Jackson La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
- State of Louisiana v. Joshua J. Ward La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
- Danny Battaglia, Quentin Coleman, James Gilmore, Anderson Hill, Scott Lingle, and Terrance Simon v. James M. LeBlanc, Secretary, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
- State v. Rathore 251 So. 3d 628 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
- State v. Logue 216 So. 3d 1140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
-
State v. Ferrera
208 So. 3d 1060
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
6/24/05), , the Louisiana Supreme Court found that part of a plea bargain appeared to have been) in inadvertently breached when the court resen-tenced defendant as a habitual offender but did not order his sentence to run concurrent with defendant’s sentence for a parole violation, as agreed by the parties in the plea agreement
-
State of Louisiana v. Quincy McKinnies, Jr.
171 So. 3d 861
La. 2014
State v. Skipper, 2004-2137, p. 5 (La.6/29/05); .
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael James Lacour
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
14:3; State v. Skipper, 04-2137, p. 3 (La.6/29/05)
-
State v. Lacour
117 So. 3d 203
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
14:3; State v. Skipper, 04-2137, p. 3 (La.6/29/05), .
- State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
-
State v. Langley
61 So. 3d 747
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
14:3; State v. Skipper, 04-2137, p. 3 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Watts
41 So. 3d 625
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
14:3; State v. Skipper, 04-2137, p. 3 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Hayes
16 So. 3d 604
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
rev’d on other grounds, State v. Skipper, 2004-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Fonseca
21 So. 3d 365
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Skipper, 2004-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Landry
15 So. 3d 138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
10 & 12; State v. Skipper, 2004-2137, p. 3 (La.6/2 9/05), -03 .
-
State v. Brister
996 So. 2d 73
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/29/05), , the supreme court held that La.R.S.
-
State of Louisiana v. Jessica Dawn Brister
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
6/29/05), the supreme court held that La.R.S.
-
State v. Lilley
996 So. 2d 348
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
_JjThe issue presented in this appeal addresses the appropriate remedy for a violation of the rule pronounced in State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.06/29/05), .
-
State v. Armstard
991 So. 2d 116
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
14:3; State v. Shaw, supra ; State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
- State of Louisiana v. Joseph Leroy Bailey, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
State v. Bailey
984 So. 2d 267
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
This is prohibited by State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Robertson
988 So. 2d 166
La. 2008
3 Cir. 5/24/06) , ; affirmed 06-1755 (La.4/11/07), , rehearing denied (La.06/01/07), we issued our opinion in State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Baker
970 So. 2d 948
La. 2008
14:3; see State v. Skipper, 2004-2137 p. 3 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Sims
973 So. 2d 177
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
6/29/05), , he asserts the introduction of evidence of the prior convictions before the jury at trial was highly prejudicial and deprived him of his right to a fair trial.
-
State v. Shaw
969 So. 2d 1233
La. 2007
14:3; State v. Skipper, 04-2137, p. 3 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/29/05), -17, the supreme court held: [W]e hold that La.
-
State v. Edwards
963 So. 2d 419
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In State v. Skipper, 04-2137, pp. 25-26, (La.6/29/05), -17 , the supreme court held: [W]e hold that La.
-
State v. Ruiz
955 So. 2d 81
La. 2007
This criminal case addresses the appropriate remedy in a post-verdict context for a violation of the rule we announced in State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Smith
952 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Relying on the recent Supreme Court decision in State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), , which states that La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Roland Joseph Peltier, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
10 6/29/05), we must agree.
-
State v. Keener
939 So. 2d 510
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Turner v. State, 04-2842 (La.6/24/05), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
6/29/05), retroactively.
-
State v. Robertson
931 So. 2d 523
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
We apply State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), retroactively.
-
State v. Ruiz
931 So. 2d 472
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR (Appeal, 06-30): Defendant argues that the "ends of justice require the granting of a new trial" due to the supreme court's ruling in State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
- State of Louisiana v. Gregory John Ruiz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Senegal
931 So. 2d 450
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Its presence in the bill made the trier of fact aware of the prior offense during trial, and Defendant contends the inclusion of the charge in the bill was improper pursuant to the supreme court's ruling in State v. Skipper, 04-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Garner
913 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
overruled on other grounds, State v. Skipper, 2004-2137 (La.6/29/05), .