Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sherman, 886 So. 2d 1116.

26 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Lonnie B. Kirklin, Jr. A/K/A Lonnie Bernard Kirklin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
10/29/04), (per curiam)(alteration in original).
State v. Jefferson 140 So. 3d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Sherman, 04-1019, p. 1 (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), .
State v. Allen 118 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court wrote: “We also note that this court has held that, in determining the correctness of a ruling on a pre-trial motion to suppress, we are not limited to the evidence presented at the hearing on that motion but may consider all pertinent evidence adduced at the trial on the merits.” In State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), , the Louisiana Supreme Court again stated: “As a general rule, an appellate court may re *517 view the testimony at trial in determining the corr
State of Louisiana v. Cedric Charles Edwards AKA Cederic C. Edwards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Edwards 107 So. 3d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Sher *893 man, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Taylor 97 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Although, as a general rule, an appellate court may review the testimony at trial in determining the correctness of the trial court’s pre-trial ruling on a motion to suppress, State v. Sherman, 04-1019, p. 1 (La.10/29/04), (per curiam), the Court’s focus should be on the trial court’s ruling to determine whether an error was made.
State v. Smith 90 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
10/29/04), ; State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 11 (La.5/22/95), ).
State v. Fisher 87 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.03/02/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Walls 86 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
2 Cir. 3/02/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Turner 82 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.3/02/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Wilson 79 So. 3d 1149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sherman, 04-1019, p. 1 (La.10/29/04), (per curiam) and the cases cited therein.
State v. Lobo 77 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sherman, 04-1019, p. 1 (La.10/29/04), (per *438 curiam) and the cases cited therein.
State v. Huntley 60 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sherman, 04-1019, p. 1 (La.10/29/04), (per curiam) and the cases cited therein.
State v. Reynolds 55 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.3/2/05), ; State v. Sherman, 2004-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
10/29/04), he 11 contends that this court’s review of the merits of the motion to suppress is limited to the evidence adduced at the hearing on the motion to suppress and cannot include evidence at the trial on the merits which generally is allowed.
State v. Cooper 2 So. 3d 1172 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.3/2/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.5/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331 (La.1/17/95)
State of Louisiana v. Demetrice Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Lewis 980 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Ayche 978 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
1279 , 167 L.Ed.2d 100 (2007) (citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), )).
State v. Wright 978 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.03/02/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Ross 965 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.03/02/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Smith 960 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Young, 39,546 (La.App.2d Cir.03/02/05), , citing State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, 94-0887 (La.05/22/95), ; State v. Brooks, 92-3331 (La.01/17/95), , (La.
State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
State v. Sherman, XXXX-XXXX (La.10/29/04), ; State v. Green, XXXX-XXXX p. 11 (La.5/22/95), .
State of Louisiana v. Danny Ray Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Sherman 896 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), .
State v. Young 895 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
In State v. Sherman, 04-1019 (La.10/29/04), , the supreme court held that: As a general rule, an appellate court may review the testimony at trial in determining the correctness of the trial court's pre-trial ruling on a motion to suppress.