Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Allen, 934 So. 2d 146.
- State Of Louisiana v. Frederick C. Mangrum La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- State Of Louisiana v. Justin Dewayne Kimble La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Akeeley Keshawn Blade La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
-
State Of Louisiana v. Michael Young
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 1st Cir. 3/ 29/ 06), - 53.
- State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Nicholls Eason La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
-
State v. Duhon
270 So. 3d 597
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 1st Cir. 3/29/06), , 154.
- State ex rel. D.H. 214 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
- State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA - Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
- State of Louisiana v. Charles J. Doyle AKA- Joey Doyle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
State of Louisiana v. Paul B. Stephan
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 3/29/06), the first circuit concluded that a twenty-five year sentence for second degree robbery was not unconstitutionally excessive: At sentencing, the court noted the defendant‟s criminal history indicated he had three prior felony convictions, specifically, convictions for simple burglary, and
-
State v. Stephan
79 So. 3d 1175
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 3/29/06) , , the first circuit concluded that a twenty-five *1186 year sentence for second degree robbery was not unconstitutionally excessive: At sentencing, the court noted the defendant’s criminal history indicated he had three prior felony convictions, specifically, convictions for simple burglary, and two convictions for po
- State ex rel. A.H. 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
- State Ex Rel. Ah 65 So. 3d 679 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2011
- State v. White 58 So. 3d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
-
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Dean Craig
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
1st Cir.3/29/06), State v. Goodwin, supra.
- State v. Stukes 19 So. 3d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State in the Interest of D.J.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 3/29/06), on error patent review, it was discovered that the bill of information filed against the juvenile was not signed by the district attorney or by one of his assistants on his behalf.
-
State ex rel. D.J.
995 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 3/29/06) , , on error patent review, it was discovered that the bill of information filed against the juvenile was not signed by the district attorney or by one of his assistants on his behalf.
-
State Ex Rel. Dj
995 So. 2d 1
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 3/29/06) , , on error patent review, it was discovered that the bill of information filed against the juvenile was not signed by the district attorney or by one of his assistants on his behalf.
-
State v. McCloud
978 So. 2d 1139
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 3/29/06), (citation omitted).
-
State v. Campbell
960 So. 2d 363
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1st Cir.3/29/06), ; State v. Goodwin, supra .
- State v. Goodwin 948 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006