Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Price, 952 So. 2d 112.

92 citing documents.

State v. Everett 96 So. 3d 605 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1 Cir. 12/28/06) , , the court decided that the testimony of the victim’s friend that she and the victim spoke by cell phone moments before and at time of the vehicular accident was a res gestate exception to the hearsay rule under present sense impression and excited utterance.
State v. Lambert 93 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1st Cir.12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 2007-0130 (La.2/22/08), .
State v. Underdonk 92 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
1st Cir.12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 2007-0130 (La.2/22/08), .
State v. Young 73 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
1st Cir.12/28/06), , writ denied, 07-0130 (La.2/22/08), ; State v. Paul, 05-612 (La.App.
State v. Douglas 72 So. 3d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1st Cir.12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 07-0130 (La.2/22/08), .
State v. Patton 68 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1st Cir.12/28/06), -25 (en banc), writ denied, 2007-0130 (La.2/22/08), .
State v. Loper 48 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
1st Cir.12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 2007-0130 (La.2/22/08), .
State v. LOUP 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 07-0130 (La.
State v. MERANTA 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Sopczak 25 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -25 (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. ZANTIZ 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Griffin 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Bickham 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), -125 (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. McElroy 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -125 (en banc), writ denied, 2007-0130 (La.
State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -125 (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Fonseca 21 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1st Cir.12/28/06), , writ denied, 2007-0130 (La.2/22/08), .
State v. Stogner 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 07-0130 (La.
State v. McGee 5 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Landry 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Parks 2 So. 3d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 12/28/06), , writ denied, 07-0130 (La.2/22/08), , defendant argued that a witness’ testimony about his conversation with another witness moments before an automobile accident constituted impermissible hearsay and violated his right to confrontation under Crawford .
State v. Hotard 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -25 (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Evans 998 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.12/28/06), -25 (en banc), writ denied, 07-0130 (La.2/22/08), .
State v. Ruiz 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 07-0130 (La.
State v. Hebert 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), -25 (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. TROQUILLE 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), -25 (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.
State v. Lavergne 991 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1st Cir.12/28/06), -125 (en banc), writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/22/08), we will correct the sentence under LSA-C.Cr.P.
State v. HONORA 978 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 07-0130 (La.
State v. Boyd 978 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc), writ denied, 07-0130 (La.
State v. Taylor 975 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 12/28/06) .[E]ven violations of the constitution, that are not inherently prejudicial to the defendant are no longer considered reversible "patent error."
State v. Fedele 973 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
12 /28/06), -125 (en banc) (petition for cert.
State v. Gilson 973 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), -125 (en banc).
State v. DUPONT 973 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), .
State v. MacK 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -25 (en banc) (petition for cert.
State v. Bonds 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -25 (en banc); State v. Riles, XXXX-XXXX, p. 2 n.3 (La.
State v. LEAGEA 966 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -125 (en banc).
State v. VERRETTE 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), -25 (en banc).
State v. Adams 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -125 (en banc) (petition for cert.
State v. Laurent 966 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 12/28/06), -25 .
State v. Griffin 956 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1st Cir.12/28/06), ; State v. Paul, 05-612 (La.App.
State v. Jackson 960 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 12/28/04) , (en banc), we hereby exercise our discretion and decline to correct the illegally lenient sentence on appeal.
State v. Riles 959 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 12/28/06), (en banc).