Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Caples, 938 So. 2d 147.

25 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Mark Houston Anglin, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
App. 1st Cir. 6/ 9/ 06), writ denied, 2006- 2466 ( La.
State of Louisiana v. Anthony Strong La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
1 Cir. 6/9/06), writ denied, 06-2466 (La.
State Of Louisiana v. Robert George Garner, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 1 Cir. 6/ 9/ 06), - 57.
State Of Louisiana v. James Matthew Cole La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 1st Cir. 6/ 9/ 06), - 57, writ denied, 2006- 2466 ( La.
State v. Conklin 274 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 1st Cir. 6/9/06), , 154, writ denied , 2006-2466 (La.
State v. Vaughn 259 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 6/9/06) , , 151, writ denied , 06-2466 (La.
State v. Brooks 258 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
1 Cir. 6/9/06) , , 156-57, writ denied , 06-2466 (La.
State v. Cespedes 241 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 1st Cir. 6/9/06), , 156-57, writ denied , 2006-2466 (La.
State v. Crucia 181 So. 3d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1st Cir.6/9/06), -55 , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.4/27/07), , (citing State v. Huntley, 97-0965, (La.3/13/98), (per curiam)).- In State v. Fearheiley, 2008-0307 (La.4/18/08), (per curiam), the Louisiana Supreme Court found thát a police officer’s observation of an apparent brief hand
State v. Zeno 155 So. 3d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1st Cir.6/9/06), , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.4/27/07), .
State v. Huey 142 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1st Cir.6/9/06), -57 , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.4/27/07), .
State v. Cambrice 64 So. 3d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 6/9/06) , , writ denied, 06-2466 (La.4/27/07), ).
State v. LEGENDRE 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 6/9/06) , , writ denied, 06-2466 (La.
State v. Bickham 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1 Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.
State v. Smith 20 So. 3d 501 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 6/9/06), -57 , writ denied, 06-2466 (La.4/27/07), , the defendant argued that in light of recent United States Supreme Court decisions upon which Mr. Smith also relies, his conviction should have been by a unanimous twelve-person jury.
State v. Lowe 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.
State v. BURKETTE 5 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.
State v. Thomas 2 So. 3d 1181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1st Cir.6/9/06), , writ denied, 06-2466 (La.4/27/07), .
State v. Burnes 997 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Mosley 996 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1st Cir.6/9/06), , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.4/27/07), .
State v. Jarrell 994 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 06-2466 (La.4/27/07), .
State v. Hebert 991 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 06-2466 (La.4/27/07), .
State v. HONORA 978 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
App. 1st Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 06-2466 (La.
State v. MacK 973 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.
State v. Hinojosa 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 6/9/06), , writ denied, 2006-2466 (La.