Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite BEUTLER ENG. CHIRO. CLIN. v. Mermentau Rice, 931 So. 2d 553.

53 citing documents.

Park Place Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Nat'l Oilwell Varco, L.P. 250 So. 3d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 5/31/06) , , and the supreme court's decision in Broussard Physical Therapy v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. , 08-1013 (La.
Park Place Surgery Center D/B/A Park Place Surgical Hospital (Brian Armstead) v. National Oilwell Varco, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
3 Cir. 5/31/06), and the supreme court’s decision in Broussard Physical Therapy v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc., 08-1013 (La.
Agilus Health (Wilbanks) v. Dresser, Inc. 81 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is "no": As they did in Beutler England Clinic [ v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Agilus Health (Atwood) v. Dresser, Inc. 81 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is "no": As they did in Beutler England Clinic [ v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
CLASC.(LIGGINS) v. Rapides Parish Sch. Bd. 81 So. 3d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is "no." As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Agilus Health v. Accor Lodging North America 52 So. 3d 68 La. 2010
8 Cir. 5/31/06) , which stated: [T]o the extent that the PPO contract purports to further limit the employer’s liability for medical care, it runs afoul of La.R.S.
Agilus Health (James Wilbanks) v. Dresser, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no”: As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Agilus Health (Kenneth McKeithen) v. Dresser, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no”: As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Agilus Health (Albert Atwood, Jr.) v. Dresser, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no”: As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Edith Cripps) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Lorraine Bryant) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” 4 As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Velt Edwards) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Patricia Bell) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Mary Cryique) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Janet Daniels) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Miah Armstrong) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Shedrick Carr) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Donna Boss) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Lawrence Liggins v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Katherine Arnold) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic (v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1088 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” As they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Rapides Parish School Board 68 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), (first alteration ours), the writer of this opinion, joined by five of the twelve judges on this court, recognized that the answer to this question is “no.” |sAs they did in Beutler England Clinic [v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.
Central Louisiana Ambulatory Surgical Center, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc. 46 So. 3d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Mar *695 ket Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Musculoskeletal Institute of Louisiana v. McDonald's Corp. 48 So. 3d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center,(edith Hilborn) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center, (Vicky Lacour) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center, (David Nardin) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center, (Bridget Huie) v. Payless Shoesource, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Travis Villemarette) v. Gilchrist Construction Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Tammy Tyler) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Patricia Harmson) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Dwight Tennie) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Carmen Lacour) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Central La. Ambulatory Surgical Center (Forrest Robinson) v. Rapides Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Agilus Health (Allison Taylor) v. Accor Lodging North America La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06), (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Agilus Health v. Accor Lodging North America 32 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 5/31/06) , (citing his dissenting opinion in Beutler England Clinic v. Market Basket No. 27, 05-952 (La.App.
Broussard Physical Therapy v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. 5 So. 3d 812 La. 2008
3 Cir. 5/31/06) , , considered the [^question of whether “the Office of Workers’ Compensation has subject matter jurisdiction to consider a claim filed by a health care provider against an employer and its insurer over a fee reduction pursuant to a preferred provider organization agreement.” Id.
Broussard Physical Therapy v. Family Dollar Stores of La., Inc. (Donna Longoria) La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/31/06), considered the question of whether “the Office of Workers’ Compensation has subject matter jurisdiction to consider a claim filed by a healthcare provider against an employer and its insurer over a fee reduction pursuant to a preferred provider organization agreement.” Id.
Broussard Physical Therapy v. Family Dollar 981 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/31/06) , , considered the question of whether "the Office of Workers' Compensation has subject matter jurisdiction to consider a claim filed by a healthcare provider against an employer and its insurer over a fee reduction pursuant to a preferred provider organization agreement."
Dr. Clark Gunderson v. F. A. Richard & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/31/06), ], the court held that La.R.S.
Clark A. Gunderson, M.D. v. F. A. Richard & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/31/06), ], the court held that La.R.S.
Clark A. Gunderson, M.D. v. F. A. Richard & Associates, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 5/31/06), ], the court held that La.R.S.
Gunderson v. FA RICHARD & ASSOCIATES 977 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), ], the court held that La.R.S.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by