Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 921 So. 2d 58.

20 citing documents.

Deanna Smith v. State of La., Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Deanna Smith v. State of Louisiana Through the Department of Transportation and Development La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Monica Anderson Versus City of Kenner and the Parish of Jefferson and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
1/19/06); 78 (citations omitted).
Welch v. Daniels 207 So. 3d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Town of Arcadia v. Arcadia Chamber of Commerce 195 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
art. 493; Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 2005-0002 (La.1/19/06), , 166 Oil & Gas Rep.
O'Hern v. Department of Police 131 So. 3d 29 La. 2013
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 05-002, n. 22 (La.1/19/06), quoting Long v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Transportation and Development, 04-0485, p. 4, n. 7 (La.6/29/05), .
Viator v. LeBeouf Bros. Towing, L.L.C. 102 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 05-0002, p. 10 (La.1/19/06), .
Explained Thomas Lemelle v. St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
1/19/06), a party asserting admiralty tort jurisdiction must establish that the incident 1) occurred on navigable waters, i.e., a maritime locale, and that 2) it had a maritime connection or flavor, i.e., a maritime nexus.
Explained Lemelle v. St. Charles Gaming Co. 118 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
As explained in Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 05-0002 (La.1/19/06), , a party asserting admiralty tort jurisdiction must establish that the incident 1) occurred on navigable waters, i.e., a maritime locale, and that 2) it had a maritime connection or flavor, i.e., a maritime nexus.
Dunaway v. Louisiana Wildlife & Fisheries Commission 6 So. 3d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corporation, 05-0002, p. 9 (La.1/19/06), .
Trinh Ex Rel. Tran v. Dufrene Boats, Inc. 6 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 2005-0002 (La.1/19/06), (providing the test for admiralty tort jurisdiction).
Distinguished DeLafosse v. Village of Pine Prairie 998 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/22/02) , , writ denied, 02-2035 (La.11/1/02), , abrogated on other grounds, Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 05-2 (La.1/1/06), .
Distinguished Tonya Ardoin Delafosse v. Village of Pine Prairie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Price v. Tenneco Oil Co. 996 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In January 2006, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 05-02 (La.1/19/06), , a factually-similar case, where the State was found not to be the owner or custodian of an unlighted well structure with which the plaintiffs' vessel allided.
Curtis Price v. Tenneco Oil Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Two weeks later on August 31, 1995, the State executed state lease 15038, which included the 1 I n n.1, the supreme court set forth two definitions for “allision”: “‘An allision is a collision between a moving vessel and a stationary object.’ Thomas J. Schoenbaum, Admiralty and Maritime Law § 14-2, 89, n. 1 (4th ed.2004).
McCloud v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 987 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 05-0002, p. 17 (La.1/19/06), .
Ronald K. Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing 945 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 05-02, p. 13 (La.1/19/06), .
Dahiya v. Talmidge Intern. Ltd. 931 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
10 (La.1/19/06), , citing Green v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc., cert.
Vicknair v. FIREFIGHTERS'PENSION FUND 929 So. 2d 1233 La. 2006
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp., 05-0002, n. 22 (La.1/19/06), quoting Long v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Transportation and Development, 04-0485, p. 4, n. 7 (La.6/29/05), , [2] Because the previous judgment only settled a dispute between the two wives regarding entitlement to a "payable" survivor benefit of a specified amount, the defendant herein