Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Abshire v. Belmont Homes, Inc., 903 So. 2d 458.

27 citing documents.

South La. Contractors, LLC v. Kraus Construction, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
6/3/05), (second and fourth alterations in original), this court addressed the proper standard for reviewing a trial court’s judgment sustaining an exception of prematurity based on an arbitration provision, stating, as follows: The dilatory exception of prematurity is provided for in La.Code Civ.P.
Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co., LLC v. Florida Gas Transmission Company LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
6/3/05), (first and third alterations in original), set forth the proper standard for reviewing a trial court’s judgment sustaining an exception of prematurity based on an arbitration provision, explaining: 4 The dilatory exception of prematurity is provided for in
Hawkins v. Meridian Res. & Exploration LLC 236 So. 3d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/3/05), (finding that the defendant had judicially confessed that Louisiana law applied based on the express statement made by defense counsel that "[a]s far as the application, we are both arguing Louisiana law.
David M. Dooley, Sr. v. Branch Banking & Trust Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
6/3/05), documents that were merely “attached to the pre-hearing memoranda filed by the litigants” were not properly introduced into evidence at the hearing on a dilatory exception.
Dooley v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. 230 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/3/05), , documents that were merely “attached to the-pre-hearing memoranda filed by the litigants” were not properly introduced into evidence at the hearing on a dilatory exception.
Doris H. Usie v. Sunshine Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
6/3/05), this court set forth the proper standard for reviewing a trial court’s judgment sustaining an exception of prematurity based on an arbitration provision, as follows: The dilatory exception of prematurity is provided for in La.Code Civ.P.
Usie v. Sunshine Homes, Inc. 222 So. 3d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
6/3/05), , this court set forth fhe proper standard for reviewing a trial court’s judgment sustaining an exception of prematurity based on an arbitration provision, as follows: The dilatory exception of prematurity is provided for in La.Code Civ.P.
Jason L. Mouret v. Belmont Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
6/3/05), and Rodriguez v. Ed’s Mobile Homes of Bossier City, La., 04-1082 (La.App 3 Cir. 12/8/04), writ denied, 05-83 (La.
Mouret v. Belmont Homes, Inc. 91 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , writ denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), ; and Rodriguez *595 v. Ed’s Mobile Homes of Bossier City, La., 04-1082 (La.App.
BP Products North America, Inc. v. Bridges 77 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1st Cir.12/30/04), , writ denied, 05-0894 (La.6/3/05), .
State of La., Dept. of Public Safety & Correct. v. Jeremy W. Riggleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections v. Riggleman 62 So. 3d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , writ denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), .
Freddie R. Lewis v. Vernon Correctional Facility La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/3/05), this court was faced with a similar evidentiary situation.
BARKLEY ESTATE COMMUNITY ASS'N v. Huskey 30 So. 3d 992 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Cir. 3/2/05), , twit denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), , the court considered the exception of prematurity based on failure to arbitrate.
Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. 982 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , writ denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), ; St.
Shaun Coleman v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Bernice P. Fontenot, Jr. v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Fontenot v. Southern Energy Homes, Inc. 978 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , writ denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), .
Leslie R. Roach v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/3/05), ( (emphasis added).
Roach v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 969 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/2/05), , unit denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), () (emphasis added).
Chad Easterling v. Royal Manufactured Housing, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/3/05), and in Rico v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc., the issue of federal preemption, or application of the Federal Arbitration Act at 9 U.S.C.
Easterling v. ROYAL MANUFACTURED HOUSING 963 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , writ denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), , and in Rico v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc., , the issue of federal preemption, or application of the Federal *403 Arbitration Act at 9 U.S.C.
Succession of Achille Bijeaux v. Mildred Bourque Broyles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/3/05), documents that were merely “attached to the pre-hearing memoranda filed by the litigants” were not properly introduced into evidence at the hearing on a dilatory exception.
Succession of Bijeaux v. Broyles 951 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
3 Cir. 3/2/05), , writ denied, 05-862 (La.6/3/05), , documents that were merely “attached to the pre-hearing memoranda filed by the litigants” were not properly introduced into evidence at the hearing on a dilatory exception.
Olen G. Quebedeaux v. Sunshine Homes, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Quebedeaux v. SUNSHINE HOMES INC. 941 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
3 Cir. 3/2/05) , , writ denied, 05-0862 (La.6/3/05), .
Crystal Smith v. Cappaert Manufactured Housing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by