Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lang v. Asten, Inc., 918 So. 2d 453.

58 citing documents.

  • Joseph v. ENTERGY 1 So. 3d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    art. 224(2) must be based on a finding that the accused violated an order of the court “intentionally, knowingly, and 1 (¡purposefully, without justifiable excuse.” Lang v. Asten, Inc., 2005-1119, p. 1 (La.1/13/06), .
  • PARISH OF ST. CHARLES v. Bordelon 998 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • Boudreaux v. Vankerkhove 993 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Dileo v. Fawer 978 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    1/13/06), , and found as follows: Based on the language of La.Code of Civ.
  • Levatino v. Levatino 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
  • Succession of Bell 964 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    See Lang v. Asten, Inc., 05-1119 (La.1/13/06), -55 .
  • Laura Leonard Leblanc v. Mitchel Brett Leblanc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    1/13/06), (quoting Brunet v. Magnolia Quarterboats, Inc., 97-187, p. 10 (La.App.
  • LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 953 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    art. 224(2) must be based on a finding that the accused violated an order of the court ‘intentionally, knowingly, and purposefully, without justifiable excuse.’ ” Lang v. Asten, Inc., 05-1119, p. 1 (La.1/13/06), (quoting Brunet v. Magnolia Quarterboats, Inc., 97-187, p. 10 (La.App.