Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lang v. Asten, Inc., 918 So. 2d 453.
-
Joseph v. ENTERGY
1 So. 3d 748
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
art. 224(2) must be based on a finding that the accused violated an order of the court “intentionally, knowingly, and 1 (¡purposefully, without justifiable excuse.” Lang v. Asten, Inc., 2005-1119, p. 1 (La.1/13/06), .
- PARISH OF ST. CHARLES v. Bordelon 998 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
- Boudreaux v. Vankerkhove 993 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-
Dileo v. Fawer
978 So. 2d 1260
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
1/13/06), , and found as follows: Based on the language of La.Code of Civ.
- Levatino v. Levatino 966 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
-
Succession of Bell
964 So. 2d 1067
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
See Lang v. Asten, Inc., 05-1119 (La.1/13/06), -55 .
-
Laura Leonard Leblanc v. Mitchel Brett Leblanc
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
1/13/06), (quoting Brunet v. Magnolia Quarterboats, Inc., 97-187, p. 10 (La.App.
-
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc
953 So. 2d 115
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
art. 224(2) must be based on a finding that the accused violated an order of the court ‘intentionally, knowingly, and purposefully, without justifiable excuse.’ ” Lang v. Asten, Inc., 05-1119, p. 1 (La.1/13/06), (quoting Brunet v. Magnolia Quarterboats, Inc., 97-187, p. 10 (La.App.