Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Salvant v. State, 935 So. 2d 646.
-
White v. COUNTY MARKET
24 So. 3d 905
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra.
-
Goza v. Parish of West Baton Rouge
21 So. 3d 320
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 17 (La.7/6/06), .
-
Lewis v. La Adrienne, Inc.
17 So. 3d 1007
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra.
-
BARCAT, LLC v. Nail
15 So. 3d 1246
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Mayzel v. Gould, 44,081 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/09), .
-
Durfee v. Durfee
12 So. 3d 984
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra.
-
Holden Ex Rel. Holden v. Zurich American Insurance
13 So. 3d 221
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
-
Mayzel v. Gould
4 So. 3d 979
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
-
Millard P. Dumesnil, III v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
We stated the following: In Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), (footnote omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
-
Dumesnil v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp.
2 So. 3d 1254
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
We stated the following: In Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), (footnote omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
-
Hansford v. ST. FRANCIS MED. CENTER, INC.
999 So. 2d 1238
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
-
Willis v. Smith
999 So. 2d 1244
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), at p. 5, , and citations therein.
- DURACHER v. Roy 994 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
-
Thibodeaux v. Krouse
991 So. 2d 1126
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 17 (La.7/6/06), .
-
Fischer v. MEGISON
986 So. 2d 95
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
-
D'AMBROSIA v. Lang
985 So. 2d 800
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), (citations omitted).
-
Lewis v. STATE, MEDICAL CENTER OF LOUISIANA
983 So. 2d 231
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
STANDARD OF REVIEW In Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), , the Louisiana *234 Supreme Court reiterated that the standard of review for factual findings in medical malpractice cases is the manifest error or the clearly wrong standard.
-
Wiley v. Lipka
975 So. 2d 726
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
-
Little v. Pou
975 So. 2d 666
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Jackson v. State, 39,759 (La.
-
Dean Classic Cars, L.L.C. v. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. ex rel. Department of Public Safety, Office of …
978 So. 2d 393
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
-
DEAN CLASSIC CARS v. Fidelity Bank
978 So. 2d 393
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
-
Turner v. DELTA BEV. GROUP/PEPSI AMERICA
973 So. 2d 764
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 2005-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), .
-
Harper v. Smith
968 So. 2d 321
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
-
Thibodaux v. LEONARD J. CHABERT MED. CENTER
981 So. 2d 686
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 14 (La.7/6/06), ; Bradbury v. Thomas, 98-1678, p. 8 (La.App.
-
Wilhite v. Thompson
962 So. 2d 493
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
-
Brown v. TULANE MED. CENTER HOS. AND CLINIC
958 So. 2d 87
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
STANDARD OF REVIEW In Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated that the standard of review for factual findings in medical malpractice cases is the manifest error or the clearly wrong standard.
-
Tanner v. Cooksey
954 So. 2d 335
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
-
LaCombe v. Bank One Corp.
953 So. 2d 161
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
In Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), (footnote omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
-
Dr. Rick Lacombe v. Bank One Corp. D/B/A Bank One
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
7/6/06), (footnote 8 omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: 9 Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding 10 cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly 11 erroneous or clearly wrong.
-
ELEVATING BOATS v. Parish of Plaquemines
953 So. 2d 826
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Salvant v. State, 05-2126, pp. 19-20 (La.7/6/06), .
-
Guy v. Bourgeois
945 So. 2d 161
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Law and Discussion In Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recently set forth the applicable standard of review from a jury verdict in a medical malpractice case: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
-
Jackson v. TULANE MEDICAL CENTER HOSP.
942 So. 2d 509
La. 2006
7/6/06), ; Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882 .
-
Ball v. CHARTER FOREST BEHAV. HEALTH SYSTEM
938 So. 2d 1092
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Jackson v. State, 39,759 (La.App.