Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Salvant v. State, 935 So. 2d 646.

82 citing documents.

  • White v. COUNTY MARKET 24 So. 3d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra.
  • Goza v. Parish of West Baton Rouge 21 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 17 (La.7/6/06), .
  • Lewis v. La Adrienne, Inc. 17 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra.
  • BARCAT, LLC v. Nail 15 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Mayzel v. Gould, 44,081 (La.App.2d Cir.2/25/09), .
  • Durfee v. Durfee 12 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra.
  • Holden Ex Rel. Holden v. Zurich American Insurance 13 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
  • Mayzel v. Gould 4 So. 3d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
  • Millard P. Dumesnil, III v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    We stated the following: In Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), (footnote omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
  • Dumesnil v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. 2 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    We stated the following: In Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), (footnote omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
  • Hansford v. ST. FRANCIS MED. CENTER, INC. 999 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
  • Willis v. Smith 999 So. 2d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), at p. 5, , and citations therein.
  • DURACHER v. Roy 994 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Thibodeaux v. Krouse 991 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 17 (La.7/6/06), .
  • Fischer v. MEGISON 986 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
  • D'AMBROSIA v. Lang 985 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), (citations omitted).
  • Lewis v. STATE, MEDICAL CENTER OF LOUISIANA 983 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    STANDARD OF REVIEW In Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), , the Louisiana *234 Supreme Court reiterated that the standard of review for factual findings in medical malpractice cases is the manifest error or the clearly wrong standard.
  • Wiley v. Lipka 975 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
  • Little v. Pou 975 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Jackson v. State, 39,759 (La.
  • Dean Classic Cars, L.L.C. v. Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. ex rel. Department of Public Safety, Office of … 978 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
  • DEAN CLASSIC CARS v. Fidelity Bank 978 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
  • Turner v. DELTA BEV. GROUP/PEPSI AMERICA 973 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 2005-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), .
  • Harper v. Smith 968 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
  • Thibodaux v. LEONARD J. CHABERT MED. CENTER 981 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 14 (La.7/6/06), ; Bradbury v. Thomas, 98-1678, p. 8 (La.App.
  • Wilhite v. Thompson 962 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Stobart, supra .
  • Brown v. TULANE MED. CENTER HOS. AND CLINIC 958 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    STANDARD OF REVIEW In Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated that the standard of review for factual findings in medical malpractice cases is the manifest error or the clearly wrong standard.
  • Tanner v. Cooksey 954 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), .
  • LaCombe v. Bank One Corp. 953 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    In Salvant v. State, 05-2126, p. 5 (La.7/6/06), (footnote omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
  • Dr. Rick Lacombe v. Bank One Corp. D/B/A Bank One La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    7/6/06), (footnote 8 omitted), the supreme court reminded us of the following: 9 Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding 10 cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly 11 erroneous or clearly wrong.
  • ELEVATING BOATS v. Parish of Plaquemines 953 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Salvant v. State, 05-2126, pp. 19-20 (La.7/6/06), .
  • Guy v. Bourgeois 945 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Law and Discussion In Salvant v. State, 05-2126 (La.7/6/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court recently set forth the applicable standard of review from a jury verdict in a medical malpractice case: Under the manifest error standard of review, a factual finding cannot be set aside unless the appellate court finds that it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
  • Jackson v. TULANE MEDICAL CENTER HOSP. 942 So. 2d 509 La. 2006
    7/6/06), ; Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882 .
  • Ball v. CHARTER FOREST BEHAV. HEALTH SYSTEM 938 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Salvant v. State, 2005-2126 (La.7/6/06), ; Jackson v. State, 39,759 (La.App.