DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 925 So. 2d 1202.

77 citing documents.

  • State v. Cox 85 So. 3d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 2005-0979 (La.4/4/06), .
  • State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-0979 (La.4/4/06), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Ricky Joseph Langley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    4/4/06), and Carriere v. Bank of Louisiana, 95-3058, p. 9 (La.
  • State v. Langley 61 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    The defendant cites two civil cases from the supreme court, Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979 (La.4/4/06), and Carriere v. Bank of Louisiana, 95-3058, p. 9 (La.12/13/96), , for the principle that the law of the case doctrine includes “the binding force of trial court rulings during later stages of the trial.” The principle pronounced is inapplicable to the present case, as the trial at issue is not a “la
  • Board of Ethics In re Davies 55 So. 3d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    7 Humphrey v. *923 City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 12 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Sullivan v. Wallace 51 So. 3d 702 La. 2010
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-0979, pp. 10-12 (La.4/4/06), -10 ; In re Succession of Boyter, 99-0761, p. 9 (La.1/7/00), ; see also La.Rev.Stat.
  • Wede v. Niche Marketing USA, LLC 52 So. 3d 60 La. 2010
    See Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 10-12 (La.4/4/06), -10 .
  • Touchet v. Broussard 31 So. 3d 986 La. 2010
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Foti v. Holliday 27 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
    1026, 1031 , 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989); Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 14 (La.4/4/06), ; State v. Benoit, 01-2712, p. 3 (La.5/14/02), .
  • RACHAL EX REL. REGAN v. State 29 So. 3d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 11 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Roosevelt Sampson v. Fred J. Rabalais La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Stewart v. DAIQUIRI AFFAIR, INC. 20 So. 3d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 10 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 2005-0979, pp. 10-12 (La.4/4/06), -1210 ; Smith, 392 So.2d at 402 ; Richie, Richie & Oberle, L.L.P.
  • State v. TWIN CITIES MEMORIAL GARDENS, INC. 997 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/4/06), ; (La.
  • In Re Succession of Breaux 992 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    art. 9; Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 2005-979, p. 10 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Ola v. Ola 985 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-0979, pp. 11-12 (La.4/4/06), .
  • State v. Gutweiler 979 So. 2d 469 La. 2008
    Civ.Code art. 9; Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 10 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Moore v. Kenilworth/Kailas Properties 978 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 7 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 974 So. 2d 635 La. 2008
    Civ.Code art. 9; Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 10 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Curtis 977 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, pp. 10-11 (La.4/4/06), -10 .
  • INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., INC. v. Hilton 966 So. 2d 545 La. 2007
    Moreover, the court of appeal reasoned that under Louisiana Civil Code article 13 (pertaining to the rules of statutory interpretation) and this Court's discussion of statutory construction in Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979 (La.4/4/06); , La.
  • State v. Langley 958 So. 2d 1160 La. 2007
    Bank of Commerce, XXXX-XXXX p. 3, n. 4 (La.12/15/06), ; Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, XXXX-XXXX p. 7 (La.4/4/06), .
  • In Re Shiplov 945 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 2005-979 (La.4/4/2006), at 1209 Following, these rules, we do not agree with Dr. Shiplov's view of the statute.
  • International Paper Company v. Sheriff William Earl Hilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4/4/06), -10 (citations omitted): The fundamental question in all cases of statutory interpretation is legislative intent and the ascertainment of the reason or reasons that prompted the Legislature to enact the law.
  • International Paper Co. v. Hilton 950 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    The Louisiana Supreme Court recently summarized the rules of statutory interpretation in Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979, p. 10-12 (La.4/4/06), -10 (citations omitted): *5 The fundamental question in all cases of statutory interpretation is legislative intent and the ascertainment of the reason or reasons that prompted the Legislature to enact the law.
  • Champagne & Rodgers Realty Co. v. Henning 947 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 05-979 (La.4/4/06), .
  • Malone v. Shyne 937 So. 2d 343 La. 2006
    See Pumphrey v. City of New Orleans, 2005-979, p. 13 (La.4/4/06), .