Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Raspanti v. Litchfield, 946 So. 2d 234.

15 citing documents.

Ramelli Janitorial Service, Inc. v. IV Waste, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
David Perry and Shantay Watkins v. F.H. Myers Construction Corporation, Myers Leasing Co., LLC, John Doe and Gray … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 3 The trial court’s June 28, 2022 judgment provided that the plaintiffs were “permitted to have an observer and permitted to record the examination.” 6 4 Cir. 11/21/06)
Elysian, Inc. and Cusachs Family Collection, L.L.C. v. Neal Auction Company, Inc., Philip B. Alford, John J. Booth, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
App. 4 Cir. 11/21/06), ).
Southern Aggregates, LLC v. Arnold Baker & Baker Ready Mix, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Roy Raspanti v. E. John Litchfield and Berrigan Litchfield, Schonekas, Mann, Traina and Thompson, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 11/21/06), (“Raspanti I”) and Raspanti v. Litchfield, 2011-0993 (La.
Treva A. Ory v. Lee M. Russell, Amanda N. Russell and Versatile Fab, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 11/ 21/ 06), writ denied, 2007- 0367 ( La.
Murungi v. Touro Infirmary 110 So. 3d 1250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 11/21/06), (quoting Helm v. Mervyn’s Dep’t Store, 97-0547 (La.App.
Raspanti v. Litchfield 89 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Johnson v. Bell 85 So. 3d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. 2330 Palmyra Street, L.L.C. 80 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
R-Plex Enterprises, LLC v. Desvignes 61 So. 3d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 11/21/06), (citation omitted).
Duffy v. Pendleton Memorial Methodist Hospital 53 So. 3d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 11/21/06) , , this court held that the trial court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs action on account of the plaintiffs failure to comply with a discovery order was an abuse of discretion.
At Your Service Enterprises, Inc. v. Swope 4 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 4 Cir. 11/21/06), (quoting Helm v. Mervyn’s Dep’t Store, 97-0547 (La.App.
Tallulah Const. v. Ne La Delta Development 982 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 11/21/06), -39 ("`[w]hen it can reasonably do so, the court should maintain a petition against a peremptory exception [of no cause of action] so as to afford the litigant an opportunity to present his evidence'")(quoting Kuebler, supra ); Humphrey v. Robertson, XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.App.
Bowser v. PREMIER AUTOMOTIVE GROUP 971 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007