Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stelluto v. Stelluto, 914 So. 2d 34.

133 citing documents.

Babineaux v. University Medical Center 177 So. 3d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Const, art. 5, § 10; Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-74 (La.6/29/05), .
MR Pittman Group, LLC v. Plaquemines Parish Government 176 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
We sometimes do convert an improperly filed appeal to an application for supervisory review and then exercise our supervisory jurisdiction, which, as we observed above, is discretionary with us. See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074, p. 7 (La.6/29/05), (“[T]he decision to convert an appeal to an application for supervisory writs is within the discretion of the appellate courts.”); see also, e.g., Lalla v. Calamar, N.V., 08-0952, p. 6 (La.App.
Jarred v. Brown 174 So. 3d 1157 La. 2015
See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074 (La.6/29/05), .
Baxter v. Baxter 171 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“[T]he decision to convert an appeal to an application for super.visory writs is within the discretion of the appellate courts.” Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074, p. 7 (La.6/29/05), .
KAS Properties, LLC v. Louisiana Board of Supervisors 167 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
See Uniform Rules — Court of Appeal, Rule 4-3; see also Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074, p. 7 (La.6/29/05), (noting that the decision to convert an appeal to an application for supervisory writs is within the discretion of the appellate courts).
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Dixie Brewing Co. 154 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“[T]he decision to convert an appeal to an application for supervisory writs is within the discretion of the appellate courts.” Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074, p. 7 (La.6/29/05), .
Perkins v. BBRC Investments, LLC 205 So. 3d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
6/29/05), ; C. Fly Marine Services, LLC v. Trinity Yachts, LLC, 13-0770 (La.App.
Board of Supervisors v. Mid City Holdings, L.L.C. 151 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Stelluto, 05-0074, p. 7 (La.6/29/05); (“[T]he decision to convert an appeal to an application for supervisory writs is within the discretion of the appellate courts.”).
Mapp Construction, LLC v. Amerisure Mutal Insurance Co. 143 So. 3d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 2005-0074 (La.6/29/05), .
Maldonado v. Kiewit Louisiana Co. 146 So. 3d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 2005-0074 (La.6/29/05), ; Roberson v. Roberson, 2012-2052 (La.
Karl E. Kimsey v. National Automotive Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Kimsey v. National Automotive Insurance Co. 153 So. 3d 1035 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074 (La.6/29/05), .
Roberson v. Roberson 122 So. 3d 561 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 2005-0074 (La.6/29/05), .
Succession of Ursin v. Board of Levee Commissioners 104 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074, pp. 7-8 (La.6/29/05), .
Diamand v. Davis 94 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Stelluto v. Stelluto, 2005-0074 (La.6/29/05), .
Parish of St. Charles Ex Rel. Department of Planning & Zoning v. Fontenot 50 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2010
5 Cir. 10/30/07) , ; (La.
Roba, Inc. v. Courtney 47 So. 3d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074 (La.6/29/05), .
Dupree v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 41 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074, p. 7 (La.6/29/05), .
Trimble v. Trimble 34 So. 3d 1168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Melissa Landry Trimble v. David Richard Trimble La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Clarence Smith v. Weeks Marine, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Smith v. Weeks Marine, Inc. 29 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
App. 3 Cir. 11/02/05), ; Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-74 (La.6/29/05), .
Sellers v. El Paso Industrial Energy, L.P. 8 So. 3d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074, p. 7 (La.6/29/05), .
Explained Shannon Cramer v. Mark Tuttle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
6/29/05), the UCCJL serves as an additional consideration in a trial court’s inquiry as to jurisdiction in custody cases.
Explained Cramer v. Tuttle 11 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
As explained in Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074 (La.6/29/05), , the UCCJL serves as an additional consideration in a trial court’s inquiry as to jurisdiction in custody cases.
Parish of St. Charles ex rel. Department of Planning & Zoning v. Fontenot 8 So. 3d 10 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
5 Cir. 10/30/07) , ; (La.App.
CAO EX REL. HUYNH v. Wilson 992 So. 2d 463 La. 2008
See Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-007 (La.6/29/05), .
Capital One Bank v. White 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State ex rel. J.W. 975 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Stelluto v. Stelluto, 2005-0074 (La.6/29/05), ; Amin v. Bakhaty, 2001-19676 (La.10/16/01), .
Cole v. Cole 971 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
Martin-Creech v. Armstrong 965 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Stelluto v. Stelluto, 05-0074 (La.6/29/05), ; Amin v. Bakhaty, 01-1967 (La.10/16/01), .
Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA 944 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Stelluto v. Stelluto, XXXX-XXXX, p. 7 (La.6/29/05), ; State ex rel., Dep't of Social Services v. Howard, 2003-2865, p. 2, n. 1 (La.App.
Gonzales v. Gonzales 934 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Stelluto v. Stelluto, XXXX-XXXX (La.6/29/05), .