Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 923 So. 2d 627.

126 citing documents.

Legarreta v. Wendy's International, Inc. 201 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Chatman v. Southern University at New Orleans 197 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), -33 .
Andre Henderson v. Avoyelles Correctional Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3/10/06), -33, the supreme court discussed the interplay between summary judgment and substantive law: Because the applicable substantive law determines materiality, whether a particular fact in dispute is material can be seen only in light of the substantive law applicable to the case.
Henderson v. Avoyelles Correctional Center 190 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
of a political subdivision.” In Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, pp. 7-8 (La.3/10/06), -33 , the supreme court discussed the interplay between summary judgment and substantive law: Because the applicable substantive law determines materiality, whether a particular fact in dispute is material can be seen only in light of the substantive law applicable to the case.
Ducote v. Boleware 216 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), .
Kevin W. Jones, Sr. v. Town of Woodworth La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Jones v. Town of Woodworth 178 So. 3d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), -33 .
Toups v. Dantin 181 So. 3d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Espinosa v. Accor North America, Inc. 174 So. 3d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
“This Court must consider if ‘the plaintiff has any law (statutory, jurisprudential, or arising from the general principles of fault) to support that the defendant owed him a duty.’ ” Chaisson , 05-1511, p. 9, 947 So.2d at 180 , quoting Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 8 (La.3/10/06), .
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC 167 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Rando v. Anco Insulations, Inc., 2008-1163 (La.5/22/09), ; Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 2005-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
McCastle-Getwood v. Professional Cleaning Control 170 So. 3d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), -633 .
Finch v. HRI Lodging, Inc. 152 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc., 13-0022 (La.06/28/13), ; Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.03/10/06), .
Gros v. Biosvert Farms LLC 142 So. 3d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Because the applicable substantive law determines materiality, whether a particular fact in dispute is material can be seen only in |filight of the substantive law applicable to the case, Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), .
Gwenda C. Orr, Et Ux. v. Academy Louisiana Co., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
3/10/06), (citations omitted).
Orr v. Academy Louisiana Co. 157 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), (citations omitted).
Alexander v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. 110 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), -633 .
Ernest and Irene Lee v. Courtney John Rhodes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3/10/06), “[a] threshold issue in any negligence action is 9 whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty.” Additionally, “[w]hether a duty is owed is a question of law.” Id.
Marcus Broussard, Jr. v. Martin Operating Partnership La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
3/10/06), (citations omitted).
Broussard v. Martin Operating Partnership 103 So. 3d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), (citations omitted).
Tracey D. Kulka v. Shag II, Inc. D/B/A the Bulldog Pool Hall" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), -33.” Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc., 08-1163, p. 27 (La.
Kulka v. Shag 100 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), -33 .” Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc., 08-1163, p. 27 (La.5/22/09), .
Chambers-Johnson v. Applebee's Restaurant 101 So. 3d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Winn v. State, Department of Natural Resources, Office of Conservation 104 So. 3d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Co., 47,008 (La.App.2d Cir.2/29/12), , citing Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Brown v. City of Monroe 103 So. 3d 486 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris Inc., 2005-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Bloxom v. City of Shreveport 103 So. 3d 383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris Inc., 2005-1095 (La.3/10/06), p. 7, , and citations therein.
Labit v. Palms Casino & Truck Stop, Inc. 91 So. 3d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 8 (La.3/10/06), (citations omitted).
Daniels v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance 92 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 2005-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Carpenter v. Foremost Signature Insurance 87 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 2005-1095 (La.3/10/06), p. 7, , and citations therein.
Masanz v. Premier Nissan, L.L.C. 81 So. 3d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), -633 .
Smith v. City of New Orleans ex rel. Shires 71 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095, p. 8 (La.3/10/06), .
Carl Jones, Sr. v. Centerpoint Energy Entex La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Jones v. Centerpoint Energy Entex 66 So. 3d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Kalvin Turnage v. Wilson Task Force, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
James A. Glenn O/B/O Cody M. Glenn v. Grant Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Glenn ex rel. Glenn v. Grant Parish School Board 49 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Turnage v. Wilson Task Force, LLC 50 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
Carrier v. City of Amite 50 So. 3d 1247 La. 2010
In Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 at p. 8 (La.3/10/06), , we discussed the principles for determining the existence of a legal duty: A threshold issue in any negligence action is whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty.
Kevin C. Trahan, Et Ux. v. the Bayou Companies, LLC, Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Jimmy Cloud v. Johnny Peart La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Cloud v. Peart 40 So. 3d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 2005-1095, p. 7 (La.3/10/06), -633 .
KAMPMANN v. Mason 42 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 2005-1095, pp. 7-8 (La.3/10/06), -633 .
Carleen Willis v. Rapides Parish Communications District A/K/A 911" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3/10/06), the supreme court stated: A threshold issue in any negligence action is whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty.
Willis v. RAPIDES PARISH COMMUNICATIONS DISTRICT 30 So. 3d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
3/10/06), , the supreme court stated: A threshold issue in any negligence action is whether the defendant owed the plaintiff a duty.
Randy J. Gary v. Moncla Well Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), -33.
Gary v. Moncla Well Service 21 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 05-1095 (La.3/10/06), -33 .
Dillon v. LA MADELEINE, INC. 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
J. Quentin Simon v. MacRo Oil Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Simon v. MACRO, INC. 18 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
S. J. v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009