Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Crochet, 931 So. 2d 1083.

32 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Thomas K. Bourque, Sr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
6/ 23/ 06), ( per curiam); State v. Friday, 2010- 2309 ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. Daniel T. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
6/ 23/ 06), ( per curiam) ( wherein the court found the defendant was not unduly prejudiced by the consolidation of the charges in light of the instructions given the jury by the trial court).
State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
6/23/06), -87 (footnote omitted) (first, third, fourth, and fifth alterations in original).
State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
6/23/06), -87 (footnote omitted) (first, third, fourth, and fifth alterations in original).
State of Louisiana v. Shelton Broadway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
6/23/06), -87 (footnote omitted) (first, third, fourth, and fifth alterations in original).
State of Louisiana v. Major Cartrell Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Crochet, 05-0123 (La.6/23/06)
State v. Jones 258 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hayes 204 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Lyons 195 So. 3d 545 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Crochet, 05-0123 (La.6/23/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Brent Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
6/23/06), the supreme court noted:2 However, for purposes of appellate review, whether the claim involves misjoinder of offenses, prejudicial joinder, or improper consolidation, the defendant must show prejudice to establish that trial of two or more crimes in a single proceeding “affect[ed]
State of Louisiana v. Lawrence Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State v. Lafleur 134 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Crochet, 05-0123 (La.6/23/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/23/06), wherein the supreme court’s per curiam decision addressed whether prejudice resulted from the consolidation of cases.
State of Louisiana v. Bryant Lakeith Bethley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
6/23/06), wherein the supreme court’s per curiam decision addressed whether prejudice resulted from the consolidation of cases.
State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Additionally, the State refers to State v. Crochet, 05-123 (La.6/28/06), , wherein the supreme court’s per curiam decision addressed whether prejudice resulted from the consolidation of cases.
State v. Bethley 107 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Additionally, the State refers to State v. Crochet, 05-123 (La.6/23/06), , wherein the supreme court’s per curiam decision addressed whether prejudice resulted from the consolidation of cases.
State v. Wright 79 So. 3d 309 La. 2011
In State v. Crochet, 05-0123 (La.6/23/06), , this Court considered whether the court of appeal erred in reversing defendant’s eonvic: tions on the grounds that the trial court allowed a joint trial of three charges involving sexual abuse by defendant towards his children (both male and female) and evidence of his similar misconduct regarding two of his stepchi
State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See also State v. Crochet, 2005-0123 (La.6/23/06), -88 (per curiam).
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
6/23/06), -86, the supreme court stated: Consolidation of two or more criminal cases is governed by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
However, in State v. Crochet, 05-123, pp. 3-5 (La.6/23/06), -86 , the supreme court stated: Consolidation of two or more criminal cases is governed by La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Crochet, 2005-0123 (La.06/23/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Charles D. Washington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
6/23/06), -88 (footnotes omitted).
State v. Smith 34 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
For purposes of appellate review, whether the claim involves misjoin-der of offenses, prejudicial joinder, or improper consolidation, the defendant must show prejudice to establish that trial of two or more crimes in a single proceeding “affect[ed] his substantial rights.” State v. Crochet, 2005-0123 (La.6/23/06), , citing La.
State v. MERANTA 30 So. 3d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Williams 15 So. 3d 348 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Crochet, 05-0123 (La.6/23/06), .
State v. Palmer 6 So. 3d 749 La. 2009
Cf. State v. Crochet, 05-0123, p. 5 (La.6/23/06), (“Assuming that the crimes are otherwise properly joined in a single prosecution ....
State v. Stevenson 998 So. 2d 692 La. 2009
Cf. State v. Crochet, 05-0123, p. 5 (La.6/23/06), ("Assuming that the crimes are otherwise properly joined in a single prosecution as a matter of La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Jarrell 994 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Crochet, 05-0123, pp. 3-5 (La.6/23/06), -86 (per curiam).
State v. Griffin 984 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Crochet, XXXX-XXXX, pp. 8-10 (La.6/23/06), -89 (per curiam).
State v. Reynolds 968 So. 2d 722 La. 2007
Cf. State v. Crochet, 05-0123, p. 5 (La.6/23/06), (state may effectuate consolidation of separately charged crimes without defendant's consent by dismissing individual bills and filing a superceding information joining all of the offenses in a single proceeding).
State of Louisiana v. Michael Gordon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State of Louisiana v. M. R. U. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
6/23/06), in support of his claim.