Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sosa, 921 So. 2d 94.

74 citing documents.

  • State v. Untereiner 82 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
    State v. Sosa, 05-213 (La.1/19/06); .
  • State v. Cunningham 77 So. 3d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Brown 63 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Sosa, 05-213, p. 7 (La.1/19/06), , (La.App.
  • State v. Freeman 34 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Roundtree 41 So. 3d 512 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Greene 26 So. 3d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The trial judge made “credibility determinations, and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness; thus, a reviewing court may impinge on the fact-finder’s discretion only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” State v. Sosa, 05-0213, p. 11 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Ealy 12 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Thomas 7 So. 3d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Dotie 1 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Banks 999 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Sosa, 05-0213 (La.01/19/06), .
  • State v. Hall 986 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Jackson 979 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Brantley 975 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Anderson 979 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    State v. Sosa, 05-0213, p. 11 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Bowers 965 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Vassar 966 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    In State v. Sosa, 05-213 (La.1/19/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the standard of review in circumstantial evidence cases: [I]n cases involving circumstantial evidence, when a jury rationally rejects the hypothesis of innocence advanced by the defendant, that hypothesis fails, and “the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesi
  • State v. Benton 960 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Sosa 948 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    State v. Sosa, 05-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Leroy Waguespack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Waguespack 939 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Sosa, 05-0213, pp. 6-7 (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Shaw 939 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State v. Hodge 938 So. 2d 1066 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    State v. Sosa, 05-0213, p. 7 (La.1/19/06), .