Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sosa, 921 So. 2d 94.
-
State v. Untereiner
82 So. 3d 425
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
State v. Sosa, 05-213 (La.1/19/06); .
-
State v. Cunningham
77 So. 3d 477
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Brown
63 So. 3d 270
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sosa, 05-213, p. 7 (La.1/19/06), , (La.App.
-
State v. Freeman
34 So. 3d 541
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Roundtree
41 So. 3d 512
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Greene
26 So. 3d 274
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The trial judge made “credibility determinations, and may, within the bounds of rationality, accept or reject the testimony of any witness; thus, a reviewing court may impinge on the fact-finder’s discretion only to the extent necessary to guarantee the fundamental due process of law.” State v. Sosa, 05-0213, p. 11 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Ealy
12 So. 3d 1052
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Thomas
7 So. 3d 838
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Dotie
1 So. 3d 833
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Sosa, 2005-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Banks
999 So. 2d 808
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Sosa, 05-0213 (La.01/19/06), .
-
State v. Hall
986 So. 2d 863
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Jackson
979 So. 2d 678
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Brantley
975 So. 2d 849
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Anderson
979 So. 2d 566
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
State v. Sosa, 05-0213, p. 11 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Bowers
965 So. 2d 959
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Vassar
966 So. 2d 654
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
In State v. Sosa, 05-213 (La.1/19/06), , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the standard of review in circumstantial evidence cases: [I]n cases involving circumstantial evidence, when a jury rationally rejects the hypothesis of innocence advanced by the defendant, that hypothesis fails, and “the defendant is guilty unless there is another hypothesi
-
State v. Benton
960 So. 2d 1192
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Sosa
948 So. 2d 236
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. Sosa, 05-0213 (La.1/19/06), .
- State of Louisiana v. Leroy Waguespack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Waguespack
939 So. 2d 636
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Sosa, 05-0213, pp. 6-7 (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Shaw
939 So. 2d 519
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
-
State v. Hodge
938 So. 2d 1066
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Sosa, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/19/06), .
- State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Surratt
932 So. 2d 736
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Sosa, 05-0213, p. 7 (La.1/19/06), .