Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lowery, 902 So. 2d 1018.

20 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Arty James Marcel La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Jordan Cyprian La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Aaron Maurice Young La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
State Of Louisiana v. Ronald St. Cyre La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Gross 218 So. 3d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Eley 203 So. 3d 462 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hebert 182 So. 3d 23 La. 2015
1 Cir. 12/17/04) ; , writ denied, 05-0397 (La.5/13/05);' .
State v. Bell 169 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
1 Cir. 12/17/04) , , writ denied, 05-0447 (La.5/13/05), .
State v. Wise 128 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
1 Cir. 12/17/04) , , writ denied, 05-0397 (La.5/13/05), (citing State v. Dixon, 95-0269, p. 3 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
5/13/05), the defendant never requested that his waiver of the right to jury trial be withdrawn.
State v. Guillory 129 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
2 Cir. 12/15/04), , writ denied, 05-401 (La.5/13/05), , the defendant never requested that his waiver of the right to jury trial be withdrawn.
State of Louisiana v. v. L. G. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Sherri Ann Sepulvado La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
5/13/05), the first circuit explained: The rules of discovery are intended to eliminate unwarranted prejudice arising from surprise testimony, to permit the defense to meet the State’s case, and to allow proper assessment of the strength of its evidence in preparing a defense.
State v. Sepulvado 59 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
1 Cir. 12/17/04) , , writ denied, 05-397 (La.5/13/05), , the first circuit explained: The rules of discovery are intended to eliminate unwarranted prejudice arising from surprise testimony, to permit the defense to meet the State’s case, and to allow proper assessment of the strength of its evidence in preparing a defense.
State of Louisiana v. Austin Blake Ceaser La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Ceaser 21 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 12/17/04), , writ denied, 05-447 (La.5/13/05), .
State v. Breaux 11 So. 3d 1246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Barras 20 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1st Cir.12/17/04), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/13/05), .
State v. Johnson 962 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
2 Cir. 12/15/04), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/13/05), : Prior convictions are specifically excluded from the rulings in Apprendi and Blakely because, unlike virtually any other consideration used to enlarge the possible penalty for an offense, a prior conviction must itself have been established through procedures satisfying the fair notice, reasonable doubt, and jury tr
State v. Young 943 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
1st Cir.12/17/04), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.5/13/05), .