Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 939 So. 2d 1245.

70 citing documents.

  • State v. King 48 So. 3d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Even so, the Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized “a serious issue as to whether the district court or the prosecutor ultimately controls the docket in certain instances.” State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 6 (La.10/17/06), -50 (where the court noted that this issue need not be addressed in that case).
  • State v. Sorden 45 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 9 (La.10/17/06), ; State v. Love, 00-3347, p. 10 (La.5/23/03), -1207 .
  • State v. Kitchens 35 So. 3d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 7 (La.10/17/06), .
  • State v. Cutno 69 So. 3d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing State v. 8Love, *427 2000-3347, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), ).
  • State v. Johnson 28 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    State v. Batiste, 2005-1571 (La.10/17/06), ; State v. Millet, 2005-1122 (La.App.
  • State ex rel. L.L. 23 So. 3d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
    State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 7 (La.10/17/06), .
  • State v. Shannon 17 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.10/17/06), , the Court addressed the codal and jurisprudential foundations relative to such issues as follows: Article 691 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure confers on the district attorney the power to dismiss a formal charge, in whole or in part, and provides that leave of court is not needed.
  • State v. COMADORE 984 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Gibson 971 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    See, e.g., State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.10/17/06), ; State v. Dees, 06-1198 (La.App.
  • State v. Chambers 966 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Recently, in State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, (La.10/17/06), , the Supreme Court stated: A court's resolution of motions to quash in cases where the district attorney entered a nolle prosequi and later reinstated charges should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
  • State v. Scott 958 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 7 (La.10/17/06), .
  • State v. Harvey 956 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing State v. Love, 2000-3347, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), ).
  • State v. Payton 954 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Recently, in State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, (La.10/17/06), , where the prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi due to the unavailability of the alleged victim to testify, the Louisiana Supreme Court found no violation of the defendant's right to a speedy trial.
  • State v. Shanklin 953 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing Love, 00-3347 at p. 14, 847 So.2d at 1209 ).
  • State v. Stevenson 952 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), , 1249 citing State v. Love, XXXX-XXXX, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), .
  • State v. Williams 951 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    *1161 Recently, in State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), , the Supreme Court stated: A court’s resolution of motions to quash in cases where the district attorney entered a nolle prosequi and later reinstituted charges should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
  • State v. Dees 950 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Also, recently in State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.10/17/06), , the Court stated: Article 691 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure confers on the district attorney the power to dismiss a formal charge, in whole or in part, and provides that leave of court is not needed.
  • State v. Walker 947 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Bias 947 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing Love, 00-3347 at p. 14, 847 So.2d at 1209 ).
  • State v. Millet 946 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Recently, in State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), , the court stated: A court's resolution of motions to quash in cases where the district attorney entered a nolle prosequi and later reinstituted charges should be decided on a case-by-case basis.