Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Batiste, 939 So. 2d 1245.
-
State v. King
48 So. 3d 1288
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Even so, the Louisiana Supreme Court has recognized “a serious issue as to whether the district court or the prosecutor ultimately controls the docket in certain instances.” State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 6 (La.10/17/06), -50 (where the court noted that this issue need not be addressed in that case).
-
State v. Sorden
45 So. 3d 181
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 9 (La.10/17/06), ; State v. Love, 00-3347, p. 10 (La.5/23/03), -1207 .
-
State v. Kitchens
35 So. 3d 404
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 7 (La.10/17/06), .
-
State v. Cutno
69 So. 3d 423
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing State v. 8Love, *427 2000-3347, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), ).
-
State v. Johnson
28 So. 3d 1167
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Batiste, 2005-1571 (La.10/17/06), ; State v. Millet, 2005-1122 (La.App.
-
State ex rel. L.L.
23 So. 3d 970
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 7 (La.10/17/06), .
-
State v. Shannon
17 So. 3d 1061
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
In State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.10/17/06), , the Court addressed the codal and jurisprudential foundations relative to such issues as follows: Article 691 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure confers on the district attorney the power to dismiss a formal charge, in whole or in part, and provides that leave of court is not needed.
- State v. COMADORE 984 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
-
State v. Gibson
971 So. 2d 389
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
See, e.g., State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.10/17/06), ; State v. Dees, 06-1198 (La.App.
-
State v. Chambers
966 So. 2d 98
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Recently, in State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, (La.10/17/06), , the Supreme Court stated: A court's resolution of motions to quash in cases where the district attorney entered a nolle prosequi and later reinstated charges should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
-
State v. Scott
958 So. 2d 725
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 7 (La.10/17/06), .
-
State v. Harvey
956 So. 2d 684
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing State v. Love, 2000-3347, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), ).
-
State v. Payton
954 So. 2d 193
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Recently, in State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, (La.10/17/06), , where the prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi due to the unavailability of the alleged victim to testify, the Louisiana Supreme Court found no violation of the defendant's right to a speedy trial.
-
State v. Shanklin
953 So. 2d 84
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing Love, 00-3347 at p. 14, 847 So.2d at 1209 ).
-
State v. Stevenson
952 So. 2d 742
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), , 1249 citing State v. Love, XXXX-XXXX, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), .
-
State v. Williams
951 So. 2d 1158
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
*1161 Recently, in State v. Batiste, 2005-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), , the Supreme Court stated: A court’s resolution of motions to quash in cases where the district attorney entered a nolle prosequi and later reinstituted charges should be decided on a case-by-case basis.
-
State v. Dees
950 So. 2d 50
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Also, recently in State v. Batiste, 05-1571 (La.10/17/06), , the Court stated: Article 691 of the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure confers on the district attorney the power to dismiss a formal charge, in whole or in part, and provides that leave of court is not needed.
- State v. Walker 947 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
State v. Bias
947 So. 2d 797
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
State v. Batiste, 05-1571, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), (citing Love, 00-3347 at p. 14, 847 So.2d at 1209 ).
-
State v. Millet
946 So. 2d 196
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Recently, in State v. Batiste, XXXX-XXXX, p. 5 (La.10/17/06), , the court stated: A court's resolution of motions to quash in cases where the district attorney entered a nolle prosequi and later reinstituted charges should be decided on a case-by-case basis.