Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 913 So. 2d 836.

32 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Shawn A. Clark La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
    App. 4 Cir. 7/20/05), writ denied, 07-811 (La.
  • State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 7/20/05), , 839-40.
  • State v. Hall 172 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
  • State v. Diggins 126 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Hackett 122 So. 3d 1164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), , citing Apprendi, supra.
  • State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • State v. Buckley 88 So. 3d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    App 4 Cir. 7/20/05), , this court held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial for factual determinations made at a multiple bill hearing.
  • State v. Lomax 81 So. 3d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), , citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct.
  • State v. Landfair 70 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Causey 67 So. 3d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), -840 , citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct.
  • STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTERREL J. BOUTTE AKA O'TERREL BOUTTE AKA O'TERRELL BOUTTE La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), State v. Collins, 2001-1459 (La.App.
  • State v. Boutte 58 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), ; State v. Collins, 2001-1459 (La.App.
  • State v. Vincent 56 So. 3d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), , citing Appren-di, supra.
  • State of Louisiana v. Steven Mark Marc" Anderson " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), writ denied, 07-811 (La.
  • State v. Anderson 48 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 7/20/05) , , writ denied, 07-811 (La.1/11/08), ; State v. Gustavis, 00-1855 (La.App.
  • State v. Turner 32 So. 3d 277 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    4th Cir.7/20/05), , writ denied, 07-0811 (La.1/11/08), .
  • State v. Juengain 41 So. 3d 499 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), (under Apprendi the defendant’s prior convictions were not required to be submitted to a jury).
  • State v. Wallace 26 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), ; State v. Collins, 2001-1459 (La.App.
  • State v. Tassin 998 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05) , , writ denied, 07-811 (La.1/11/08), , the defendant argued that the State should have sought a grand jury indictment on the issue of the habitual offender bill, as he could have been sentenced to life imprisonment as a quadruple offender under the habitual offender bill.
  • State of Louisiana v. Deandre Johnson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), writ denied, 07-811 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Melvin Tassin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), writ denied, 07-811 (La.
  • State v. Johnson 996 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05) , , writ denied, 07-811 (La.1/11/08), ; State v. Jackson, 05-1281 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 989 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), -840 ; see also State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
  • State v. Kelly 986 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05) , , citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct.
  • State v. Dunbar 981 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Gauthier 978 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05) , , citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct.
  • State v. Baker 970 So. 2d 948 La. 2008
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), ; State v. White, 39,634 p. 3 (La.App.
  • State v. Alexander 958 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), , this Court stated: hoUnder La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Wilson 956 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), , this court stated: The defendant contends that under La.
  • State v. Dozier 949 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), , this court stated: The defendant also argues that he was entitled to a jury trial on the issue of his multiple offender status.
  • State v. Jackson 947 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 7/20/05), , the State argues that the trial court erred by holding that it needed to bring an indictment.
  • State v. Baker 935 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 7/20/05) , , was convicted as a quadruple | soffender.