Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Holmes, 931 So. 2d 1157.

28 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Gerald Lynn Artis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 5/10/06), the fourth circuit explained as follows: 7 When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of
State of Louisiana v. Isaac Thomas Gee La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 5/10/06), the fourth circuit explained as follows: When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
State of Louisiana v. Dajuan Alridge La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Roland Butler La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
State v. Williams 262 So. 3d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 5/10/06), , 1162 ).
State v. Doucette 243 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 5/10/06), , 1161.
State v. Alridge 249 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 5/10/06), , 1161 (citations omitted).
State v. Dove 194 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Williams 137 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Quinn 123 So. 3d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Peters 123 So. 3d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 5/10/06), , this court fully discussed the standard to be used when a defendant disputes his identity as the perpetrator of an offense: *317 When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidenti-fication in order to carr
State v. Ruano 120 So. 3d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 5/10/06), ; State v. Nogess, 98-0670 (La.App.
State v. Gilmore 156 So. 3d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Christopher Sherman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Williams 66 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Peters 60 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State of Louisiana v. Jermaine Perry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Perry 9 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Adams 993 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
App. 4 Cir. 5/10/06), , this Court discussed the standard to be used when a defendant disputes his identity as the perpetrator of an offense: When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden
State v. Bedou 985 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/10/06), , the court discussed the standard to be used when a defendant disputes his identity as the perpetrator of an offense: When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burden
State Ex Rel. Jn 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
App. 4 Cir. 5/10/06), : To suppress an identification, a defendant must first prove that the identification procedure was suggestive.
State ex rel. J.N. 984 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/10/06) , : |4To suppress an identification, a defendant must first prove that the identification procedure was suggestive.
State ex rel. A.M. 983 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State Ex Rel. Am 983 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Stovall 977 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/10/06), : An identification procedure is suggestive if, during the procedure, the witness' attention is unduly focused on the relator.
State v. Washington 952 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 5/10/06), , this court discussed the standard to be used when an appellant disputes his identity as the perpetrator of an offense: , When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its bur
State v. Washington 952 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 5/10/06), , this court discussed the standard to be used when an appellant disputes his identity as the perpetrator of an offense: When a key issue at trial is whether the defendant was the perpetrator of the crime, the State is required to negate any reasonable probability of misidentification in order to carry its burde