DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Turner, 936 So. 2d 89.

13 citing documents.

  • The Cartesian Company, Inc. and Greg Gachassin v. the Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Panel a … La. 2023
    7/10/06), (“Because the defendant did not establish the statute was vague as it pertained to his conduct, the trial court prematurely found the statute was unconstitutionally vague.)” As declared by the appellate court in Cartesian II: “[T]his matter does not involve First Amendment freedoms, and therefore the pl
  • State v. Beaudette 97 So. 3d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    See State v. Turner, 2005-2425 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
  • State v. Nye 89 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Turner, 2005-2425 (La.7/10/06), .
  • State v. Golston 67 So. 3d 452 La. 2011
    State v. Turner, 2005-2425 (La.7/10/06), .
  • State v. Bell 53 So. 3d 437 La. 2010
    In State v. Turner, 05-2425 (La.7/10/06), , this Court upheld the constitutionality of La.C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    Superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in State v. Turner, 05-2425 (La.7/10/06), .
  • State v. Bertrand 6 So. 3d 738 La. 2009
    State v. Turner, 05-2425, p. 17 (La.7/10/06), ; Mercadel , 03-3015 at p. 8, 874 So.2d at 834 .
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    In State v. Turner, 05-2425 (La.7/10/06), -97 , cert.
  • State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
    In State v. Turner, 05-2425(La.7/10/06), , this Court upheld the constitutionality of LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • Baker Pile Driving & Site Work, LLC v. State, Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 978 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Dunn 974 So. 2d 658 La. 2008
    As indicated in my concurrence in State v. Turner, 05-2425 (La.7/10/06), , this court was required in State v. Williams, 01-1650 (La.11/1/02), , and State v. Dunn, 01-1635 (La.11/1/02), , to provide a procedure where none existed by cobbling together analogous statutory provisions.
  • State v. Lee 976 So. 2d 109 La. 2008
    State v. Turner, 05-2425, p. 12 (La.7/10/06), ("[n]either Atkins nor other controlling legal principles compel the selection of a specific fact finder regarding mental retardation or require the determination be made at a specific point in the adjudication process.").
  • State v. Dodson 942 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    State v. Turner, 2005-2425 (La.07/10/06), .