Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 899 So. 2d 559.

27 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Willie H. Battle La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana Versus Mahlon R. Norton, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana Versus Lawrence Sly La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Jimmy O'Neal Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
5 Cir. 11/30/04), writ denied, 05-81 (La.4/22/05), the fifth circuit found that the defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront his co-defendant, who had made an out-of-court statement that the defendant was the one who killed the victim, then refused to testify at trial.
State v. Hankton 251 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Troherro Keith Batiste La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
5 Cir. 11/30/04), writ denied, 05–81 (La.4/22/05), the fifth circuit found that the defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront his co-defendant, who had made an out-of-court statement that the defendant was the one who killed the victim, then refused to testify at trial.
State v. Batiste 246 So. 3d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, 05-81 (La.4/22/05), , the fifth circuit found that the defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront his co-defendant, who had made an out-of-court statement that the defendant was the one who killed the victim, then refused to testify at trial.
State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
5 Cir. 11/30/04), writ denied, 05- 0081 (La.4/22/05)
State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Luckey 212 So. 3d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Turner 138 So. 3d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Davis 128 So. 3d 1162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 11/30/04) ; -02 , writ denied, 05-81 (La.4/22/05); , to support his argument that his right to confrontation was violated.
State v. Pham 119 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
5 Cir. 11/30/04) ; , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05); .
State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
4/22/05), the fifth circuit found that the defendant was denied his Sixth Amendment right to confront his co-defendant, who had made an out-of-court statement that the defendant was the one who killed the victim, then refused to testify at trial.
State v. Turner 91 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , unit denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Robertson 995 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 11/30/04), , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Merwin 984 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 11/30/04), , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. MICELOTTI 984 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
5 Cir. 11/30/04), , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Toussaint 974 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), , in support of his argument that his constitutional rights guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment were violated when the trial court allowed Detective Locascio to testify that his investigation led to the identity of the defendant.
State v. Lagarde 960 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Davis 947 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
5th Cir.11/30/04), , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Trackling 921 So. 2d 79 La. 2006
State v. Trackling, 04-3222 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Weaver 917 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir.11/30/04), , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Lewis 917 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), .
State v. McGinnis 917 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/22/05), .
State v. Leonard 910 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
5 Cir. 11/30/04) , , writ denied, 05-0081 (La.4/22/05), , (applying harmless error analysis to inadmissible testimonial hearsay of an accomplice).