Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Pastorek, 944 So. 2d 564.
-
Meyer & Associates, Inc. v. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana
185 So. 3d 222
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-447 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Simmons v. State, Department of Children & Family Services
171 So. 3d 1147
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477 (La.12/18/06), pp. 20-21, .
-
Skillman v. Riverside Baptist Church of Jefferson Parish
171 So. 3d 407
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
5 Cir 4/23/14), -71 , rehearing granting in part for clarification on other grounds and otherwise denied, 13-332 (La.5/21/14), (citing Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477 (La.12/18/06), ).
-
Williams v. Walgreen Louisiana Co.
168 So. 3d 812
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Sullivan v. City of Baton Rouge
170 So. 3d 186
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hanks v. Entergy Corporation, 06-477 (La.12/18/06), -81 ; Lirette, 563 So.2d at 852-53 ; Hartec Corporation v. GSE Associates, Inc., 10-1332 (La.App.
-
Blake v. City of Port Allen
167 So. 3d 781
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hanks v. Entergy Corporation, 06-477 (La.12/18/06), ; Stobart v. State, Through DOTD
-
Vidal Skinner v. State of La, Etc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Hunt Transport, Inc., 2009-1408, p. 14 (La.3/16/10); Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477, p. 20-21 (La.12/18/06)
-
Skinner v. State
149 So. 3d 342
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hunt Transport, Inc., 2009-1408, p. 14 (La.3/16/10); ; Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477, p. 20-21 (La.12/18/06); .
- Doris Bell v. Dolgencorp, LLC D/B/A Dollar General Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
-
Scarberry v. Entergy Corp.
136 So. 3d 194
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The record indicates that the trial judge’s “utmost care” instruction was based on lá and Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Commercial Flooring & Mini Blinds, Inc. v. Edenfield
138 So. 3d 30
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Phyllis J. Green v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
“[T]he issue to be 3 resolved by the reviewing court is not whether the factfinder was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder’s conclusion was a reasonable one.” Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, p. 23 (La.12/18/06)
-
Green v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury
123 So. 3d 1272
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
“[T]he issue to be |4resolved by the reviewing court is not whether the factfinder was right or wrong, but whether the factfin-der’s conclusion was a reasonable one.” Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, p. 23 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc.
120 So. 3d 678
La. 2013
Hunt Transport, Inc., 2009-1408, p. 14 (La.3/16/10); ; Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477, p. 20-21 (La.12/18/06); .
-
Papania v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University
108 So. 3d 256
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477, pp. 23-24 (La.12/18/06), -581 ; Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern R.R., 2000-2628, p. 13 (La.4/3/01), .
- Ernest and Irene Lee v. Courtney John Rhodes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
-
State v. 2002 Chevrolet Trail Blazer
104 So. 3d 394
La. 2012
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-0477, p. 19 (La.12/18/06), (“Proof is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when the entirety of the evidence, both direct and circumstantial, shows the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.”).
-
Joseph v. Williams
105 So. 3d 207
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“Proof is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when the entirety of the evidence both direct and circumstantial, shows the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.” Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, p. 19 (La.12/18/06), .
-
State v. 2002 Chevrolet Trail Blazer
91 So. 3d 487
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
App. 5 Cir. 7/9/98); (); Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, p. 19 (La.12/18/06); (“Proof is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when the entirety of the evidence both direct and circumstantial, shows the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not.”).
-
Caskey v. Merrick Construction Co.
86 So. 3d 186
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
366 , see also Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Powell v. Chabanais Concrete Pumping, Inc.
82 So. 3d 548
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-0477 (La.12/18/06), ; Benjamin ex rel.
-
Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Nunley
77 So. 3d 457
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
See Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477 (La.12/18/06), fn.
-
Randy Williams v. Iesi-La Corporation
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
In Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, p. 19-20 (La.12/18/06), the supreme court pointed out that: In an action to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by another’s negligence, the plaintiff has the burden of proving negligence on the part of the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence.
-
In re L.P.
64 So. 3d 850
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
12/18/06), (citing Louisiana State Bar Assoc.
- Roxane Montgomery v. C & C Self Enterprises, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
-
Montgomery v. C & C SELF ENTERPRISES, INC.
62 So. 3d 279
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[T]he issue to be resolved by the reviewing court is not whether the factfinder was right or wrong, but whether the factfinder’s conclusion was a reasonable one.” Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-77, p. 23 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Wade ex rel. Wade v. Mini World Daycare
63 So. 3d 1045
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Kevin Campbell, Et Ux. v. Coast Concrete Services, Inc.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
12/18/06), the supreme court stated: In an action to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by another’s negligence, the plaintiff has the burden of proving negligence on the part of the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence.
-
Campbell v. Coast Concrete Services, Inc.
51 So. 3d 168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In Hanks v. Entergy Corporation, 06-477, p. 19-20 (La.12/18/06), , the supreme court stated: In an action to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by another’s negligence, the plaintiff has the burden of proving negligence on the part of the defendant by a preponderance of the evidence.
-
Thomas v. Comfort Center of Monroe, LA, Inc.
48 So. 3d 1228
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, pp. 20-21 (La.12/18/06), .
-
In Re Succession of Firmin
38 So. 3d 445
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hanks v. Entergy Corporation, 2006-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Buffman Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co.
36 So. 3d 1004
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
See Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-0477, p. 24 (La.12/18/06), ; Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
- Laura Cox Brown v. Shelter Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
-
Cox v. Shelter Insurance Co.
34 So. 3d 398
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Munoz v. Norden
28 So. 3d 562
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-0477, p. 22-23 (La.12/18/06); .
-
Yee v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co.
25 So. 3d 872
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Id.; Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Herrera v. United Fire & Casualty Co.
27 So. 3d 919
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477 (La.12/18/06), .
- J. Quentin Simon v. MacRo Oil Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Simon v. MACRO, INC. 18 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- Sherar v. Besse 15 So. 3d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
PINEGAR v. Harris
20 So. 3d 1081
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, p. 19 (La.12/18/06), .
- Sarhan v. Florists Mutual Insurance Company 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
Nunnery v. City of Kenner
17 So. 3d 411
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Citing Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477, p. 22 (La.12/18/06), ; Stobart v. State, Though DOTD, and Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc., 03-3024, p. 6-7, -95 .
- White v. American International Group, Inc. 11 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- Bernstein v. Powerhouse Gym of Metairie, Inc. 9 So. 3d 254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
WENDELBOE v. Exxon Shipping Co.
6 So. 3d 882
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Hanks v. Entergy Corporation, 06-477, p. 14 n. 10 (La.12/18/06), n. 10 (citation omitted).
-
Stone v. Bullard
2 So. 3d 1241
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 2006-477 (La.12/18/06), ; Lemann v. Essen Lane Daiquiris, Inc., 2005-1095 (La.3/10/06), .
- Joyce Marie Perry v. Capital One, N.A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-
Perry v. Capital One, N. A.
1 So. 3d 794
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Hanks v. Entergy Corp., 06-477 (La.12/18/06), .
-
Brooks v. TRANSIT MANAGEMENT OF SOUTHEAST LA.
996 So. 2d 9
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
12/18/06), ; Lemann v. Essen Road Daiquiries, Inc., XXXX-XXXX, p. 8 (La.3/10/06), .