Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Breitenbach v. Stroud, 959 So. 2d 926.

14 citing documents.

Denisa Joshua v. Community Care Center of Heritage House, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
App. 1 st Cir. 2/ 9/ 07)
Rentrop v. Arch Ins. Co. 241 So. 3d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 1 Cir. 2/9/07), , 931.
Jones v. Black 145 So. 3d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
1 Cir. 2/9/07), , As with all other admissible evidence, expert testimony is subject to being tested by vigorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof.
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Willis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Willis 53 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Crawford v. DIAMOND B. CONSTRUCTION, LLC 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1st Cir. 2/9/07), .
Brown Radiator and Frame v. Kidd 13 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1st Cir.2/9/07), ; Parker v. Parker, 44,246 (La.App.
Richard v. BAYOU LAFOURCHE FRESH WATER DISTRICT 9 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 1 Cir. 2/9/07), -940 .
Rickey Clark v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1 Cir. 2/9/07), testimony regarding a motorist’s prior conviction for possession of a schedule II narcotic was found admissible for impeachment purposes in her personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle accident.
Clark v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 997 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 1 Cir. 2/9/07), , testimony regarding a motorist's prior conviction for possession of a schedule II narcotic was found admissible for impeachment purposes in her personal injury action arising out of a motor vehicle accident.
Penton v. CITY OF HAMMOND POLICE DEPT. 991 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Millican v. COREGIS INSURANCE COMPANY 973 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Terrance v. Dow Chemical Co. 971 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
1 Cir. 2/9/07) , ; Cooper v. United Southern Assur.
City of Baton Rouge v. TERRACE LAND COMPANY, INC. 962 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
App. 1st Cir. 2/9/07), .