DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mayeux, 949 So. 2d 520.

32 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Allen Joseph Morehead La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial, alleging that one of the jurors had failed to disclose that he had personal and business relationships with several of the trial participants.
  • State v. Morehead 239 So. 3d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    3 Cir. 1/10/07) , , the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial, alleging that one of the jurors had failed to disclose that he had personal and business relationships with several of the trial participants.
  • State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • State v. Broussard 224 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher Lance Washburn La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial, alleging that one of the jurors had failed to disclose that he had personal and business relationships with several of the trial participants.
  • State v. Washburn 206 So. 3d 1143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    3 Cir. 1/10/07) , , the defendant argued that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a new trial, alleging that one of the jurors had failed to disclose that he had personal and business relationships with several of the trial participants.
  • State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Wayne Montgomery La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Montgomery 158 So. 3d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
  • State of Louisiana v. Mitchell Pat Mayeux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
  • State of Louisiana v. Russell Gene Ware, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    2002); (3rd Cir., 2007); (3rd Cir., 2005).
  • State v. Ware 80 So. 3d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    State v. Mayeaux [Mayeux ], ([La.App.]
  • State v. Scoggins 70 So. 3d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 1/10/07) , ; and State v. Patterson, 2005-560 (LaApp.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ronald Joseph Ourso La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Ourso 67 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Courtney Paul Savoy La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), -35 (citations omitted).
  • State of Louisiana v. Kevin Charles Gasaway La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), ” State v. Gasaway, an unpublished writ ruling bearing docket number 07-1447 (La.App.
  • State v. Gasaway 57 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 1/10/07) , .” State v. Gasaway, an unpublished writ ruling bearing docket number 07-1447 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Joseph Anthony Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State of Louisiana v. Michael Jason Miller La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State v. Miller 49 So. 3d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 1/10/07) , , the defendant was convicted of forcible rape.
  • State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), the defendant was convicted of forcible rape.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rodney J. Tolliver La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Tolliver 11 So. 3d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Mason N. Godfrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • State v. Godfrey 4 So. 3d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. D. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), this court made the following comments: The United States Supreme Court has determined that there are three components of a true Brady violation: The evidence must be favorable to the accused, either exculpatory or impeaching in nature; the evidence must have been suppressed by t
  • State v. D.T. 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), , this court made the following comments: The United States Supreme Court has determined that there are three components of a true Brady violation: The evidence must be favorable to the accused, either exculpatory or impeaching in nature; the evidence must have been suppressed by the State either willfully or ina
  • State v. DT 998 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 1/10/07), , this court made the following comments: The United States Supreme Court has determined that there are three components of a true Brady violation: The evidence must be favorable to the accused, either exculpatory or impeaching in nature; the evidence must have been suppressed by the State either willfully or ina
  • State of Louisiana v. E. J. F. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. EJF 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • State v. E.J.F. 999 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008