Reese v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Also decided on this docket: La., May 5, 2006 927 So. 2d 298
Reese v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 942 So. 2d 509 (La. 2006).
The holding in the court’s own words
After hearing oral arguments on September 6, and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this court's supervisory authority.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- Wolfe Washauer Construction, LLC v. Felicia Dart La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
- Alphonse L. Fabre, Jr. and Veronica S. Fabre v. Robert L. Manton, Janet Funke … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
- Jennifer Landry v. John Doe and Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
- Thomas C. Dufreche v. Jeffrey Wayne Coco, Md and Internal Medicine Specialists, Inc. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
- Toston v. St. Francis Medical Center, Inc. 178 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
- Sullivan v. City of Baton Rouge 170 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
- Medical Review Panel Proceedings for the Claim of Serpas v. Tulane University Hospital & … 161 So. 3d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- Fanguy v. Patwardhan 136 So. 3d 998 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
- Bloxham v. Jeffrey V. Anzalone, D.D.S., L.L.C. 134 So. 3d 1216 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
- Coody v. Barraza 111 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
- Hays v. Christus Schumpert Northern Louisiana 72 So. 3d 955 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
- Malant v. Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 32 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Opinion text
942 So.2d 509 (2006) Sylvanus Gordon REESE & Lola Reese v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. No. 2006-C-0097. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 17, 2006. John M. Robin, Covington, for Applicant. Barrasso, Usdin, Kupperman, Freeman & Sarver, New Orleans, Meredith A. Cunningham, Judy Y. Barrasso, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. We granted plaintiffs' application for a writ of certiorari in this case on May 5, 2006. After hearing oral arguments on September 6, 2006 and reviewing the record of the matter, we conclude the judgment below does not require the exercise of this court's supervisory authority. Accordingly, we recall our order of May 5, 2006 as improvidently granted, and we deny plaintiffs' writ application.