DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dishon v. Ponthie, 927 So. 2d 317.

34 citing documents.

  • Nicol Edward Hannie v. Colonial Oaks Al Lafayette Employer, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
    5/5/06), a panel of this court applied the “single business entity” theory to extend liability beyond a separate entity, noting 3] that we had recognized but not relied on the theory in previous cases."
  • Gbb Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    5/5/06), (quoting Green v. Champion Ins.
  • GBB Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, Inc. 230 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    5/5/06), , (quoting Green v. Champion Ins.
  • Fausse Riviere, L.L.C. v. Snyder 211 So. 3d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
  • Johnson v. Montoya 145 So. 3d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    2 Cir. 1/27/06), , writ denied, 06-0453 (La.5/5/06), , and writ denied, 06-0600 (La.5/5/06), , wherein the appellate court affirmed a $15,000.00 general damage award for a battery, false arrest, and false imprisonment.
  • Shermane Hector v. Mo Dad Environmental Serv., LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
  • Hector v. Mo-Dad Environmental Serv., LLC 134 So. 3d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writ denied, 06-599 (La.5/5/06), .
  • Philip Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800, writs denied, 06- 585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), noted the following: ....
  • Fontenot v. Louisiana Workers' Compensation Corp. 94 So. 3d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: [[Image here]] In determining whether the worker has discharged his or her burden of proof, the trial court should accept as true a witness’s uncontradicted testimony, although the witness is a party, absent “circumstances casting suspicion on the reliability of this testimony.” West, 371 So.2d
  • Viney J. Silas v. Sowela Technical College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800, writs denied, 06- 585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone
  • Silas v. Sowela Technical College 84 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are
  • Interstate Battery Systems of America, Inc. v. Charles Bryant Kountz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Interstate Battery Systems of America, Inc. v. Kountz 78 So. 3d 200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writ denied, 06-599 (La.5/5/06), .
  • State of Louisiana v. Draymond Paul Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    2 Cir. 4/28/10), -26, the second circuit discussed several cases involving excessive use of force (see Nelson v. City of Shreveport, 40,494 (La.App.2d Cir.1/27/06), writs denied, 06-453 (La.5/5/06), -600 (La.5/5/06), Patton v. Self, 06-1029 (La.App.
  • State v. Compton 66 So. 3d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2d Cir.1/27/06), , writs denied, 06-453 (La.5/5/06), , 06-600 (La.5/5/06), ; Patton v. Self, 06-1029 (La.App.
  • Hall v. City of Shreveport 36 So. 3d 419 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    In Nelson v. City of Shreveport, 40,494 (La.App.2d Cir.1/27/06), , writs denied, 06-0453 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0600 (La.5/5/06), , a retired police officer filed suit for excessive force arising from his arrest by a *424 Shreveport police officer.
  • Keith Smith v. Boise Cascade, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Smith v. BOISE CASCADE, LLC 34 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -801 (emphasis ours), writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), .
  • Billy Ray Woodard v. Town of Colfax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    5/5/06), we reviewed the standard of review and the claimant’s burden of proof in a workers’ compensation case: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases:
  • Woodard v. TOWN OF COLFAX 29 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -801 , wits denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , we reviewed the standard of review and the claimant’s burden of proof in a workers’ compensation case: In Dean v. Southmark Construction, 03-1051, p. 7 (La.7/6/04), , the supreme court discussed the standard of review in workers’ compensation cases: I.Jn worker’s compensation cases, the appropriat
  • Peyton Place, Condominium Associates, Inc. v. Guastella 18 So. 3d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writ denied, 2006-0599 (La.5/5/06), .
  • Gregory Scott v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), addressed both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Scott v. City of Pineville 8 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , addressed both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -36 , writ denied, 2006-0599 (La.5/5/06), ; Hamilton v. AAI Ventures, L.L.C., 99-1849, pp. 5-6 (La.App.
  • David Bailey v. Aecom La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800, writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to di
  • Shane M. Sartelle v. Footlocker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), -0636 (La.5/5/06), had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Sartelle v. Footlocker 996 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), , had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Hamilton v. Compass Group USA/Morrison 973 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writ denied 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), .
  • Kenneth D. Lopez v. Town of Zwolle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), writs denied, 06-0585 11 (La.5/5/06), -0636 (La.5/5/06), had 12 occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden 13 of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed 14 accidents.
  • Lopez v. Town of Zwolle 963 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05) , , writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), , had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving *1043 unwitnessed accidents.
  • Timothy Butterfield v. Turner Industries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    5/5/06), noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge
  • Butterfield v. Turner Industries 951 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee's burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are
  • Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United 939 So. 2d 673 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    3 Cir. *676 12/30/05), , writs denied, 06-0585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-0636 (La.5/5/06), , had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant's burden of proof in workers' compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.
  • Justin Phillips v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., United Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    5/5/06), had occasion to address both the standard of review and a claimant’s burden of proof in workers’ compensation cases involving unwitnessed accidents.