DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 946 So. 2d 144.

75 citing documents.

  • Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “[A]llocation of fault is not an exact science, or the search for one precise ratio, but rather an acceptable range, and that any allocation by the fact finder within that range cannot be ‘clearly wrong.’ ” Foley v. Entergy La., Inc., 06-0983, p. 32 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Schysm v. Boyd 47 So. 3d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Fontenot, supra; Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 2006-0983 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Baer v. Cabiran-Baer 44 So. 3d 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Inc., 2006-0983, p. 10 (La.11/29/06); .
  • Ratliff v. LSU Board of Supervisors 38 So. 3d 1068 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Inc., 2006-0983, p. 10 (La.11/29/06); .
  • David Charlie v. Leno Hai Congtang, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Charlie v. Hai Congtang 37 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Laura Cox Brown v. Shelter Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Cox v. Shelter Insurance Co. 34 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Foley v. Entergy La., Inc., 06-983 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Brewer v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 35 So. 3d 230 La. 2010
    Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983, p. 9 (La.11/29/06), ; Ferrell v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., 94-1252, pp. 3-4 (La.2/20/95), .
  • Key v. Monroe City School Board 32 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    Inc., 2006-0983 (La.11/29/06), ; Evans v. Lungrin, 97-0541 *1149 (La.2/6/98)
  • Flowers v. Entergy Corporation 30 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 23 So. 3d 259 La. 2009
    Foley v. Entergy La., Inc., 06-0983, p. 32 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Millsap v. Cain 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    11/29/06), , 156 n.4, and Five N Company, L.L.C. v. Stewart, XXXX-XXXX (La.
  • Carol Ann St. Julian v. Harold Wiltz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    11/29/06), -154: [A] trial court’s factual findings will not be upset unless they are manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
  • St. Julian v. Wiltz 21 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The supreme court discussed the standard of review appropriate to civil cases in Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-983, pp. 9-10 (La.11/29/06), ,153-154: [A] trial court’s factual findings will not be upset unless they are manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
  • Galloway v. Lolley 17 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Co., 07-2441 (La.4/8/08), ; Foley v. Entergy Louisiana Inc., 06-0983 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The Louisiana Supreme Court has admonished that “allocation of fault is not an exact science, or |3Sthe search for one precise ratio, but rather an acceptable range, and that any allocation by the factfinder within that range cannot be ‘clearly wrong.’” Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983, p. 32 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Millard P. Dumesnil, III v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    11/29/06), -55 (emphasis ours) our supreme court set out a thorough analysis on the subject: In cases of injury occurring as a result of contact with overhead power lines, principles of negligence, rather than absolute or strict liability, apply, and we assess the liability of the various parties
  • Dumesnil v. Southwest Louisiana Electric Membership Corp. 2 So. 3d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    LAW AND DISCUSSION Due to the nature of the product in which they deal, the duty owed by electric transmission companies which maintain and employ high power lines to distribute electricity is higher than that of the “ordinary man.” In Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983, pp. 11-12 (La.11/29/06), -55 (emphasis ours) our supreme court set out a thorough analysis on the subject: In cases of injury occurring as a result of contact with overhead power lines, principles of negligence, rather th
  • Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 988 So. 2d 186 La. 2008
    Foley v. Entergy La., Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.11/29/06), .
  • Clarkston v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    We are also cognizant that the allocation of fault is not an exact science, or the search for one precise ratio, but rather an acceptable range, and that any allocation by the factfinder within that range cannot be “clearly wrong.” Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983, p. 32 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Clarkston v. LA. FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. CO. 989 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983, p. 32 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 974 So. 2d 635 La. 2008
    Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983, p. 32 (La.11//29/06), .
  • State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Cecil 966 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Inc., 2006-0983 (La.11/29/06), .
  • Graves v. Riverwood Intern. Corp. 949 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Foley v. Entergy Louisiana, Inc., 06-0983 (La.11/29/06), ; Keith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 96-2075 (La.05/09/97), .