Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rabalais v. Nash, 952 So. 2d 653.

65 citing documents.

  • Wallace v. Howell 30 So. 3d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The standard of review applicable to fact findings of the trial court has been clearly enunciated by our Supreme Court in Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999, p. 4 (La.3/9/07), , 657: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clearly wrong....
  • Cotton v. DELTA QUEEN STEAMBOAT CO., INC. 36 So. 3d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    “[A] Court of Appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clearly wrong.” Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999, p. 4 (La.3/09/07), .
  • Wall v. Kelly Oil & Gas Company, Inc. 27 So. 3d 1071 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Rabalais v. Nash, 2006-0999 (La.3/9/07), ; Roton v. Faulconer, 42,452 (La.App.2d Cir.10/3/07), , writ denied, 2007-2165 (La.1/7/08), ; Foshee v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas.
  • Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 23 So. 3d 259 La. 2009
    Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999, p. 5 (La.3/9/07), -658 ; Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522, p. 6-7 (La.1/15/02), .
  • Ronald Ables v. Frank C. Minvielle La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Rabalais v. Nash, 2006-0999 (La.3/9/07), Foshee v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., 41,842 (La.App.2d Cir.1/31/07), writ denied, 2007-0483 (La.4/20/07)
  • Ables v. Minvielle 22 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Rabalais v. Nash, 2006-0999 (La.3/9/07), ; Foshee v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., 41,842 (La.App.
  • Solow v. Heard McElroy & Vestal, L.L.P. 7 So. 3d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    See also Rabalais v. Nash, 2006-0999 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Bienemann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 3 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999, p. 4 (La.3/9/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court has recently reiterated the applicable standard of review as follows: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Little v. Boston Scientific Corp. 8 So. 3d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Rabalais v. Nash, 2006-0999 (La.3/9/07), (some citations omitted).
  • Slone v. Greber 989 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999 (La.3/9/07), .
  • Doris Saunier v. Lacye Nolan La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3/9/07), : It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court’s or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Dufrene v. Gautreau Family, LLC 980 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    STANDARD OF REVIEW In the case of Rabalais v. Nash, 06-0999 (La.3/9/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court once again set forth the standard of review to be applied to factual determinations of the trial court: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clearly wrong.
  • Bittner v. Scott 980 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    General further asserts that the trial court erred in casting Jeffrey Scott in judgment when he was never joined as a defendant and never made an appearance In the case of Rabalais v. Nash, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/9/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court once again set forth the standard of review to be applied to factual determinations of the trial court: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in the absence of manifest error or unless it is
  • Sawyer v. Christiana 973 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
    XXXX-XXXX (La.3/9/07), 657, the Louisiana Supreme Court once again set forth the standard of review to be applied to factual determinations of the trial court: It is well-settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury's finding of fact in the absence of manifest error or unless it is clea
  • Roton v. Vernon E. Faulconer, Inc. 966 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Rabalais v. Nash, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/9/07), ; Foshee v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., 41,842 (La.App.2d Cir.1/31/07), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.4/20/07), .