DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 974 So. 2d 635.

78 citing documents.

  • Cathy Lynn Porter Bennett v. T. Barrett Porter La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • Sylvester v. Fontenot 58 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    are based on determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses, the manifest error-clearly wrong standard demands great deference to the findings of fact, for only the factfinder is 112cognizant of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavily on the listener’s understanding and belief in what is said.” Hebert v. Rapides Parish *683 Police Jury, 06-2001, p. 3 (La.1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • Bennett v. Porter 58 So. 3d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, 06-2164 (La.1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • Scott Thompson v. Susan Molinari La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    See Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, p. 3 (La.1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • Succession of Milton Elie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • Succession of Elie 50 So. 3d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, 06-2164 (La.1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • Nicol E. Hannie v. Ray Allen Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Bennie C. Lewis v. B-N-D Garage & Towing, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Hannie v. Guidry 48 So. 3d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, 06-2164 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Eric Brown v. American Central Casualty Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Brown v. American Central Casualty Co. 40 So. 3d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Hebert v. McClarity 30 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Malant v. Willis-Knighton Pierremont Health Center 32 So. 3d 1058 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    *1065 The supreme court discussed the manifest error standard of review in Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 2006-2001 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 27 So. 3d 1085 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Apportionment of Fault The Louisiana Supreme Court summarized in Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001 (La.4/11/07), , the standard for reviewing allocation of fault determinations: Finding the same considerations applicable to the fault allocation process as are applied in quantum assessments, “the trier of fact is owed some deference in allocating fault” since the finding of percentages of fault is also a factual determination.
  • Howard v. Union Carbide Corp. 21 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, p. 3 (La.4/11/07), , 654 -45 (La.
  • Holmes v. Hicks 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Richard v. Berrigan 11 So. 3d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Arnold v. Ouachita Parish Fire Department 12 So. 3d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    In Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001 (La.4/11/07), , *466 the supreme court outlined the determination of liability for a public body: Most cases alleging negligence on the part of a public body have been analyzed by this Court under the duty-risk analysis.
  • Davis v. Green 5 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 2006-2001 (La.4/11/07), ; Edwards v. Horstman, 96-1403 (La.2/25/97), .
  • Randy Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    4/11/07), and McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club, 05-1013 (La.App.
  • Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance 5 So. 3d 954 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    3 Cir. 7/12/06) , , rev'd on other grounds, 06-2001, 06-2164 (La.4/11/07), , and McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club, 05-1013 (La.App.
  • Wooley v. Lucksinger 14 So. 3d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Hebert v. Rapids Parish Police Jury, 2006-2001, p. 24 (La.4/11/07), -54 (on rehearing); Maraist & Lemmon, 1 La.
  • Fontenot v. PATTERSON INS. 997 So. 2d 529 La. 2008
    Relying on its previous decision in Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, 06-2164 (La.4/11/07), , the court of appeal found that the proper standard of review was de novo.
  • Holloway v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 988 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Subsequent to its important ruling in Long, the Louisiana Supreme Court had another occasion in Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001 (La.4/11/07), , to address an alleged assumption of duty by DOTD for an off-system highway bridge owned by a parish police jury.
  • In Re Succession of Wagner 993 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001, p. 3 (La.1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • Amos v. Ouachita Parish Police Jury 991 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001 (La.04/11/07), ; Foley v. Sportran, City of Shreveport, 40,624 (La.App.
  • Porter v. MONROE HOUSING AUTHORITY 986 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/16/08), (on rehearing).
  • MacK v. Wiley 991 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury, 06-2001 (La.1/16/08), .