DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kaiser v. Hardin, 953 So. 2d 802.

110 citing documents.

  • Watson v. Hicks 172 So. 3d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Edmond v. Cherokee Insurance Co. 170 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    See Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Chermaine P. Dibartolo, Et Ux. v. Stage One - the Hair School, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084, p. 5 (La.4/8/97)
  • Kelley v. General Insurance Co. of America 168 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092 (La.4/11/07), -811 (per curiam).
  • Hobgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 156 So. 3d 1244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    iana Supreme Court has indicated, in order to alter a jury’s factual conclusions with regard to special damages, including future medical expenses, “an appellate court must satisfy a two-step process based on the record as a whole: There must be no reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s conclusions, and the finding must be clearly wrong.” Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 12-13 (La.4/11/07), , citing.
  • Williams v. Mathieu 155 So. 3d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (citing McGee v. A C and S, Inc., 05-1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Gaspard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 155 So. 3d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Co., 09-1869 (La.3/16/10), ; Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam ).
  • Marie Monte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07)
  • Monte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 139 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Khammash v. Clark 145 So. 3d 246 La. 2014
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084, p. 5 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Aymami v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital Service District No. 1 145 So. 3d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Romano v. Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office 138 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
    Id.; Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Carter v. Briggs 136 So. 3d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of N. Amer., 96-1084 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), ("Special damages are those which have a ‘ready market value,' such that the amount of the damages theoretically may be determined with relative certainty”); see also Wainwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492 (La.
  • Succession of Sigur v. Henritzy 126 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Wain wwright v. Fontenot, 00-0492, p. 5 (La.10/17/00), (noting that “[sjpecial damages are those which either must be specially pled or have a ‘ready market value,’ i.e. the amount of damages supposedly can be determined with relative certainty.”) The Louisiana Supreme Court set forth the standard of review for special damages in Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), , as follows: In reviewing a jury’s factual conclusions with regard to special damages, an appellate court must satis
  • Travis v. Spitale's Bar, Inc. 122 So. 3d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    See, Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), -811 ; Fontana v. Newman, 11-1793 (La.App.
  • Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 144 So. 3d 791 La. 2013
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084, p. 5 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Granger v. Christus Health Central Louisiana 144 So. 3d 736 La. 2013
    In order for this court to overturn a lower court’s finding of fact, there must be “no reasonable factual basis” for the trial court’s conclusions, and the finding must be “clearly wrong.” Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam).
  • Papania v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 108 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Johnson , 2010-0387 at p. 12, 63 So.3d at 96 ; Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Nina Skinner v. State of Louisiana, Dotd La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06–2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam) 7 (citing McGee v. AC and S, Inc., 05–1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General Ex Rel. State of Louisiana v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084 (La.4/8/97)
  • Caldwell ex rel. State v. Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. 100 So. 3d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Wanda Turner v. Gumarco C. Escobedo La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084 (La.4/8/97)
  • Turner v. Escobedo 89 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Pirtle v. Allstate Insurance 92 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    The standard of review for special damages was set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 1112 (La.4/11/07), , 810: Special damages are those which have a “ready market value,” such that the amount of the damages theoretically may be determined with relative certainty, including medical expenses and lost wages.
  • Succession of Horrell 102 So. 3d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 12 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084, p. 5 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Duncan v. Bartholomew 88 So. 3d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • Sonja Dauzat Deligans, Et Ux. v. Ace American Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam) (citing McGee v. AC and S, Inc., 05-1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Deligans v. Ace American Insurance 86 So. 3d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam) (citing McGee v. AC and S, Inc., 05-1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Cline v. Cheema 85 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Bobby Abshire v. Continental Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084, p. 5 (La.4/8/97)
  • McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 65 So. 3d 1218 La. 2011
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084, p. 5 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 63 So. 3d 87 La. 2011
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), ; Guillory v. Insurance Co. of North America, 96-1084 (La.4/8/97), .
  • Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC 58 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Coxe Property Management & Leasing v. Woods 46 So. 3d 258 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    The standard of review for special damages is set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), , 810: |4Special damages are those which have a “ready market value,” such that the amount of the damages theoretically may be determined with relative certainty, including medical expenses and lost wages.
  • Barbara Raymond v. Government Employees Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam) (citing McGee v. AC and S, Inc., 05-1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Raymond v. Government Employees Insurance 40 So. 3d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam) (citing McGee v. A C and S, Inc., 05-1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Moffitt v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 40 So. 3d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), , states: | ^Special damages are those which have a “ready market value,” such that the amount of the damages theoretically *347 may be determined with relative certainty, including medical expenses and lost wages.
  • Scott v. American Tobacco Co., Inc. 36 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), .
  • Buffman Inc. v. Lafayette Insurance Co. 36 So. 3d 1004 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    The Supreme Court noted in Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, pp. 11-12 (La.4/11/07), , 810: Special damages are those which have a "ready market value," such that the amount of the damages theoretically may be determined with relative certainty...
  • Iles v. Ogden 37 So. 3d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam) (citing McGee v. AC and S, Inc., 05-1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Yee v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. 25 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    General damages are those which may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they involve “mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or lifestyle which cannot be definitely measured in monetary terms.” Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092 (La.4/11/07), , and citations therein.
  • Ory v. Shedd 17 So. 3d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Nelson Radiology Associates, L.L.C. v. Integrity Medical Systems, Inc. 16 So. 3d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “General damages are those which *1209 may not be fixed with pecuniary exactitude; instead, they ‘involve mental or physical pain or suffering, inconvenience, the loss of intellectual gratification or physical enjoyment, or other losses of life or life-style which cannot be definitely measured in monetary terms.’ ” Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), 809 , citing Keeth v. Dept. of Pub.
  • Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092, p. 11 (La.4/11/07), (per curiam) (citing McGee v. AC and S, Inc., 05- *1118 1036 (La.7/10/06), ).
  • Sarhan v. Florists Mutual Insurance Company 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • MASARIEGOS v. Morgan 5 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Moody v. AIG Insurance Companies 999 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092 (La.4/11/07), *1211 .
  • Farmer v. PATRICIAN SLP, LLC 997 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Co., 07-1335 (La.4/18/08), ; Kaiser v. Hardin, 06-2092 (La.4/11/07), ; Duncan v. Kansas City Railway Co., 00-0066 (La.
  • Adams v. Kern 987 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    In Kaiser v. Hardin, 2006-2092 (La.4/11/07), , the Court explained: Special damages are those which have a "ready market value," such that the amount of the damages theoretically may be determined with relative certainty, including medical expenses and lost wages.