DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite London Towne Condo. Ass'n v. LONDON TOWNE, 939 So. 2d 1227.

77 citing documents.

  • Barber v. Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau 97 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401 (La.10/17/06), ; Taylor v. Babin, 08-2063 (La.App.
  • Wells v. Zadeck 89 So. 3d 1145 La. 2012
    See, London Towne Condominium Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401 (La.10/17/06), (“[T]he trial court’s findings of fact on the issue of prescription are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.”).
  • Barbe v. American Sugar Refining, Inc. 83 So. 3d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Homeowner's Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), (citing Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ).
  • CHEF MENTEUR LAND CO., LTD. v. Sandrock 78 So. 3d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), (citing Carter v. Haygood, 04-0646 (La.1/19/05), ).
  • BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. Smith 71 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Homeowner's Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), (citation omitted).
  • Darren Dugas v. Bayou Teche Water Works, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Dugas v. Works 61 So. 3d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Cotton v. Williams 62 So. 3d 820 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    “[A] trial court’s findings of fact on the issue of prescription are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.” London Towne Condominium Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 48 So. 3d 234 La. 2010
    London Towne Condominium *245 Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Guillot v. Daimlerchrysler Corp. 50 So. 3d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See London Towne Condominium, Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, pp. 9-10 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Amos v. ROOMS TO GO LOUISIANA CORP. 43 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    London Towne Condominium Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, p. 9 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Samantha Dauzat v. Financial Indemnity Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • State of Louisiana v. Jennifer Collins Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Williams v. Williams 22 So. 3d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-401 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Benoit v. Wooderson 7 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Natasha Simona A. Benoit v. James Michael Wooderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Derivas v. Falbaum 2 So. 3d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    London Towne Condominium Homeowner’s Association v. London Towne Company, 2006-401 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Ferguson v. Sugar 988 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    The Louisiana Supreme Court in London Towne Condominiums Homeowner's Ass'n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, p. 4 (La.10/17/06), , noted that: "When prescription is raised by peremptory exception, with evidence being introduced at the hearing on the exception, the trial court's findings of fact on the issue of prescription are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review."
  • Gadpaille v. Thomas 990 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    v. London Towne Co., 2006-401 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Boykins v. Boykins 984 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    STANDARD OF REVIEW In London Towne Condominium Homeowner's Ass'n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401, (La.10/17/06), , our Louisiana Supreme Court noted that: *184 When prescription is raised by peremptory exception, with evidence being introduced at the hearing on the exception, the trial court's findings of fact on the issue of prescription are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Marine v. AEROJET HELICOPTERS OF ARIZONA, INC. 978 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • Bridges v. HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL CORPORATION 977 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
    The standard of review of a ruling on prescription was set forth by the Supreme Court in London Towne Condominium Homeowner's Ass'n v. London Towne Co., 06-401, pp. 4-5 (La.10/17/06), , 1231: When prescription is raised by peremptory exception, with evidence being introduced at the hearing on the exception, the trial court's findings of fact on the issue of prescription are subject to the manifest error-clearly wrong standard of review.
  • Whitten v. Moorman 973 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Ass'n v. London Towne Co., 2006-401 (La.10/17/06), , the court held that when an obligee seeks to annul an act of the obligor, "the relevant date for prescriptive purposes is the date the obligee knew or should have known of the act, and * * * the date of recordation of the act does not, standing alone, commence the running of prescription."
  • Jessie Bell v. American International Group La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. O'Neal Jones La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Jones 948 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    London Towne Condominium Homeowner’s Ass’n v. London Towne Co., 06-0401 (La.10/17/06), .
  • Bell v. AMERICAN INTERN. GROUP 950 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    London Towne Condominium Homeowner's Ass'n v. London Towne Co., 06-0401 (La.10/17/06), .