Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ordodi, 946 So. 2d 654.

263 citing documents.

State v. Bourgeois 113 So. 3d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Clouatre 110 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
art. 821(B); State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207 (La.11/29/06), ; -09 (La.1988).
State v. Davis 111 So. 3d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Ann. art. 821(B); State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. T.T. 111 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
P. art. 821(B); State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207 (La.11/29/06), ; -09 (La.1988).
State v. Taylor 103 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
In State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207 (La.11/29/06), , the Louisiana *523 Supreme Court reversed the Third Circuit’s reversal of a conviction for attempted carjacking, stating, “We cannot say that the jury’s determination is irrational under the facts and circumstances presented to them[J” The Third Circuit affirmed an attempted carjacking conviction on similar grounds
State v. Underdonk 92 So. 3d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207 (La.11/29/06), ; -09 (La.1988).
State v. Marrero 92 So. 3d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207, p. 10 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Jones 74 So. 3d 197 La. 2011
14:10(1); State v. Ordodi, 06-0207 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Patton 68 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Alvin Donald Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Craddock 62 So. 3d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
See State v. Ordodi, 06-0207, p. 14 (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Jason Allen Lomax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Loper 48 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
art. 821(B); State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207, p. 10 (La.11/29/06), ; -09 (La.1988).
State v. Taylor 38 So. 3d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
See State v. Ordodi, XXXX-XXXX, p. 14 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. LANDOR 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. LOUP 34 So. 3d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana v. Muller 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Thurman 30 So. 3d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Dykes 30 So. 3d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Negron 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
11/29/06), ; State v. Mussall, 523 So.
State v. Constance 25 So. 3d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Wise 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Griffin 24 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Claiborne 17 So. 3d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Morris 22 So. 3d 1002 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Ordodi, 06-0207, p. 14 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Stogner 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Bridgewater 11 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Prine 13 So. 3d 758 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Ordodi 06-0207 (La.11/29/06), |11 .
State v. Dell 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Landry 15 So. 3d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2781, 2789 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207, p. 10 (La.11/29/06), ; -09 (La.1988).
State v. McGee 5 So. 3d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Wilkerson 5 So. 3d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Ardoin 6 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
P. art. 821(B); *240 State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207, p. 10 (La.11/29/06), ; -09 (La.1988).
State v. Landry 5 So. 3d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
11/29/06), we find that there clearly is sufficient evidence in the record that Defendant had the specific intent to commit second degree kidnapping.
State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Given that we must view the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution and that any rational finding by the jury must be upheld per State v. Ordodi, 06-207 (La.11/29/06), , we find that there clearly is sufficient evidence in the record that Defendant had the specific intent to commit second degree kidnapping.
State of Louisiana v. Henry Bryan Lowe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); see also State v. Ordodi, 06-207, (La.11/29/06)
State v. Lowe 999 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); see also State v. Ordodi, 06-207, (La.11/29/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Harold Dewayne Baylor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), is equally unpersuasive.
State v. Baylor 998 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
In declining this invitation, we note the recent case of State v. Ordodi, 06-207, pp. 14-15 (La.11/29/06), , wherein our supreme court overturned this court's reversal of a conviction by stating, "[i]n reviewing the evidence of the defendant's actions .
State v. Dickinson 5 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
See State v. Ordodi, 2006-0207, p. 14 (La.11/29/06), .
State v. Lowe 994 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. GALMON 993 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Rowell 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Ruiz 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
11/29/06), ; State v. Mussall 523 So.
State v. Hebert 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Lay 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Robert Jacobs La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/29/06), overturned this court’s reversal of a conviction by stating, “[i]n reviewing the evidence of the defendant’s actions .
State v. Jacobs 987 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Our supreme court, in State v. Ordodi, 06-207, pp. 14-15 (La.11/29/06), , overturned this court's reversal of a conviction by stating, "[i]n reviewing the evidence of the defendant's actions ...