Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Coleman, 970 So. 2d 511.

20 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Tobe Lawrence Jr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
State v. Hampton 261 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
11/2/07), , the Louisiana Supreme Court did not review sufficiency of the evidence prior to reversing the defendant's conviction and remanding for a new trial due to Batson violations.
State of Louisiana v. Robert Glen Coleman 188 So. 3d 174 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Lee Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
2317 (discussing clues to “the prosecutors’ intentions”); State v. Coleman, 06-0518 (La.11/2/07), (finding “the State consciously took race into account”).
State v. Coleman 121 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
In State v. Coleman, 06-0518 (La.11/2/07), , the court ruled that the prosecutor’s statements that there was a black defendant and white victims “interjected the issue of race.” The court concluded that “once an inappropriate explanation invoking racial consideration is made, a subsequent, valid reason for exercising the peremptory challenge cannot purge the r
State of Louisiana v. Brendall Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
State v. Bourque 114 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
For instance, “[b]ody language has been held to constitute a valid, race-neutral basis for defeating a Batson claim.” State v. Coleman, 06-518, p. 6 (La.11/2/07), .
State v. Grant 105 So. 3d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Coleman, 2006-0518 (La.11/2/07), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Daniel Wilkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
11/2/07), the supreme court stated: “Here, the explicit interjection of race, without further explanation, renders implausible any explanation other than that the decision to strike this prospective juror was not race-neutral, but was based specifically on the juror‟s race, in violation of the fundamental precepts of B
State v. Wilkins 94 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The State notes that in State v. Coleman, 06-518, p. 8 (La.11/2/07), , the supreme court stated: “Here, the explicit interjection of race, without further explanation, renders implausible any explanation other than that the decision to strike this prospective juror was not race-neutral, but was based specifically on the juror’s race, in violation of the fundamental precepts of Bat
State v. Nelson 85 So. 3d 21 La. 2012
2317 (discussing clues to “the prosecutors’ intentions”); State v. Coleman, 06-0518 (La.11/2/07), (finding “the State consciously took race into account”).
State v. Jacobs 67 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Coleman, 06-518, p. 4 (La.11/2/07), (citing Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 S.Ct.
State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
70 , 175 L.Ed.2d 233 (2009); State v. Coleman, 06-0518 (La.11/2/07), (conviction reversed and death sentence vacated by this Court on a Batson violation; remanded for new trial); State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), , cert.
State v. Jacobs 32 So. 3d 227 La. 2010
Jacobs, 2007-887 p. 21 n. 75, 13 So.3d at 693 n. 75, citing State v. Coleman, 2006-518 (La.11/2/07), .
State v. Maxwell 17 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See State v. Coleman, 2006-0518, p. 9 (La.11/02/07), -517 .
State v. Jacobs 13 So. 3d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Coleman, 06-518 (La.11/2/07), ; State v. Taylor, 06-558 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/2/07), (quoting State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), ).
State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
State of Louisiana v. Raymond J. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
11/2/07), (quoting State v. Green, 94-887 (La.5/22/95), ).
State v. Anderson 996 So. 2d 973 La. 2008
See State v. Holmes, 06-2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, 06-0518, (La.11/2/07), (conviction reversed and death sentence vacated by this Court on a Batson violation; remanded for new trial); State v. Leger, 05-0011 (La.7/10/06), ; State v. Bridgewater, 00-1529 (La.1/15/02), ; State v. Jacobs, 99-1659 (La.6/29/01), ; State v. Howard, 98-0064 (La.4/23/99)