Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Anderson, 949 So. 2d 544.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Keyhaid J. McGee La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
State of Louisiana v. Kevin Robert Sterling La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/07), -48.
State of Louisiana v. Damien J. Debose La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/07), (first citing U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 809, 102 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Floyd Falkins La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/07), (quoting State v. Pham, 2001-2199, p. 3 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Montreal Davis La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/07), (quoting State v. Pham, 2001-2199, p. 3 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Brandon Deschune Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/07), writ denied, 07-468 (La.
State v. Nelson 260 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/07), , 546.
State v. Watts 223 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 1/17/07), , this Court discussed the automobile exception as follows: Although a warrant is generally required prior to conducting a search, California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 , 105 S.Ct.
State v. Myles 186 So. 3d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Hall 160 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 1/17/07), (quoting State v. Pham, 2001-2199, p. 3 (La.App.
State v. Anderson 136 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Candebat 133 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 1/17/07), , this Court stated: The district court’s findings of fact on a motion to suppress are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard and the district court’s ultimate determination of Fourth Amendment reasonableness is reviewed de novo.
State v. Vessel 131 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Lockett 120 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/17/07), -48 ; see also Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U.S. 465 , 119 S.Ct.
State v. Fields 120 So. 3d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Caliste 131 So. 3d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/17/07), , 547-548: Although a warrant is generally required prior to conducting a search, California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 [ 105 S.Ct.
State v. Thomas 116 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 1/17/07), , 546 On the other hand, probationers and parolees have a reduced expectation of privacy which allows reasonable warrant-less searches of their persons and residences by their probation or parole officer, even though less than probable cause may be shown.
State v. Reed 107 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Lampton 95 So. 3d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Bell 70 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Taylor 50 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
4 Cir. 1/17/07), , writ denied, 07-0468 (La.10/12/07), (citing State v. Pham, 01-2199, p. 3 (La.App.