Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Payton, 954 So. 2d 193.

13 citing documents.

State v. Brooks 210 So. 3d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 02/28/07) , (citing State v. Love, 00-3347 (La.
State v. Jago 209 So. 3d 1078 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 02/28/07) , (citing State v. Love, 00-3347 (La.
State v. Quinn 136 So. 3d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 2/28/07) , , this Court found a seventeen month lapse between the filing of a bill of information charging possession of cocaine, a violation of La.
State v. Boudreaux 131 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/28/07), (citing State v. Love, 00-3347, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), ).
State of Louisiana v. Robyn B. Little Davis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4th Cir.02/28/07), the trial court held that the state‟s failure to timely seek a continuance did not bar reinstitution of the same charges after the prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi immediately upon the denial of its motion for a continuance on the day trial was originally set to begin.
State of Louisiana v. Carol Noland Saltzman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
4th Cir.02/28/07), the trial court held that the state‟s failure to timely seek a continuance did not bar reinstitution of the same charges after the prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi immediately upon the denial of its motion for a continuance on the day trial was originally set to begin.
State v. Davis 129 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4th Cir. 02/28/07), , the trial court held that the state’s failure to timely seek a continuance did not bar reinstitution of the same charges after the prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi immediately upon the denial of its motion for a continuance on the day trial was originally set to begin.
State v. Saltzman 128 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4th Cir.02/28/07), , the trial court held that the state’s failure to timely seek a continuance did not bar reinstitution of the same charges after the prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi immediately upon the denial of its mo *1093 tion for a continuance on the day trial was originally set to begin.
State v. Mendoza 113 So. 3d 288 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
4 Cir. 2/28/07), (citing State v. Love, 00-3347, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), ).
State v. Durham 90 So. 3d 1126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
4 Cir. 2/28/07), (citing State v. Love, 00-3347, p. 14 (La.5/23/03), ).
State v. Chisolm 983 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 2/28/07), (seventeen month delay in prosecuting one count of possession of cocaine was found not presumptively prejudicial)(citing State v. DeRouen, 96-0725 (La.App.
State v. HEDGSPETH 974 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
4th Cir.02/28/07), , the trial court held that the state's failure to timely seek a continuance did not bar reinstitution of the same charges after the prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi immediately upon the denial of its motion for a continuance on the day trial was originally set to begin.
State v. Scott 958 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 2/28/07) , (seventeen month delay in prosecuting one count of possession of cocaine was found not presumptively prejudieial)(citing State v. DeRouen, 96-0725 (La.App.