DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Williams, 977 So. 2d 160.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Jamal Christopher Lacon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    4 Cir. 1/23/08), writ denied, 08-413 (La.
  • State of Louisiana Versus John Spears La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    App. 4 Cir. 1/23/08); writ denied, 08-413 (La.
  • State v. Handy 259 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 1/23/08), (the defendant was not prejudiced on appeal by the lack of transcription of in-chamber portions of the jury voir dire in the record which contained detailed jury sheets that indicated the peremptory strikes for each party as well as the jurors who ultimately served on the jury or whom the defendant had to excuse perem
  • State v. Falgout 198 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Jones v. Cain 151 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    4 Cir. 1/23/08), -177 ; State v. Mims, 97-1500, p. 45 (La.App.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08), writ denied, 08-413 (La.
  • State v. Hamilton 127 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08) , , writ denied, *86 08-413 (La.10/24/08), , the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State v. Ross 115 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08) , (finding harmless repeated references by the State as to what the teardrop tattoos on the defendant’s face meant).
  • State of Louisiana v. Demarcus W. Law La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08), writ denied, 08-413 (La.10/24/08), the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State v. Law 110 So. 3d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    4 Cir. 1/23/08) , , unit denied, 08-413 (La.10/24/08), , the defendant argued that his right to full appellate review was impinged because the in-chambers portion of voir dire, where he raised challenges for cause, was not available.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jody D. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 1/23/08), writ denied, 08-413 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. L. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    4 Cir. 1/23/08), writ denied, 08-413 (La.
  • State v. Sartain 2 So. 3d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Falcucci 982 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    4 Cir. 1/23/08) , , the fourth circuit held that the defendant was not prejudiced on appeal by the lack of transcription of in-chamber portions of the jury voir dire in the record.