Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Brazile, 960 So. 2d 333.

24 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Willie J. Stevens, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 5/30/07), writ denied, 2007-1339 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lionel Serigne, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
App. 4 Cir. 5/30/07), and State v. 9 Patin, 11-0488, p. 19 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Willie J. Stevens, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
4 Cir. 5/30/07), (same), writ denied, 07-1339 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Deismond Derral Simmons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
4 Cir. 5/30/07), (same), writ denied, 07-1339 (La.1/7/08)
State v. Pierre 192 So. 3d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 5/30/07), -36 , this Court acknowledged that, as a result of the shutdown in operations in the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court due to the effects of Hurricane Katrina, the time limitations set forth in La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Bibbins 153 So. 3d 419 La. 2014
4 Cir. 5/30/07), (same), writ denied, 07-1339 (La.1/7/08), .
State v. Dillon 124 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Patin 95 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Franklin 62 So. 3d 817 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
4 Cir. 5/30/07) , , writ denied, 2007-1339 (La.1/7/08), (finding Hurricane Katrina was a cause beyond the control of the state for purposes of La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Davis 21 So. 3d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 4 Cir. 5/30/07), , this Court recognized that Hurricane Katrina, which struck New Orleans on August 29, 2005, constituted a cause beyond the control of the State that prevented it from trying the defendant according to the terms of Article 578.
State v. Shannon 17 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 5/30/07) , , writ denied, 07-1339 (La.1/7/08), (finding Hurricane Katrina was a cause beyond the control of the state for purposes of La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Ervin 9 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
4 Cir. 5/30/07) , (finding Hurricane Katrina was a cause beyond the control of the state for purposes of La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Williams 5 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
App. 4 Cir. 5/3/07), -336 .
State v. Stokes 2 So. 3d 1127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07) , , writ denied 2007-1339 (La.1/7/08), , this Court had the responsibility of interpreting the statutes relating to the period of limitation in which to bring a defendant to trial (La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Lenox 999 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07) , , writ denied, 2007-1339 (La.1/7/08), , this Court reiterated the established principle that a joint motion for continuance constitutes a preliminary plea that serves to suspend the proceedings in accordance with La.
State v. COMADORE 984 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07), , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/7/08), , this Court held that Hurricane Katrina fell within the provisions of art. 579 A(2), which states in part that the time limitations of art. 578 shall be interrupted if the defendant cannot be tried "for any other cause beyond the control of the state."
State v. MILLRO 989 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07) , , writ denied, 07-1339 (La.1/7/08), .
State v. Stewart 983 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07) , , writ denied, 07-1339 (La.1/7/08), , stated that the delays caused by Hurricane Katrina were beyond the control of the state.
State v. Hamilton 980 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07), -336 , this Court acknowledged that the effects of Hurricane Katrina caused a shut down of the operations in the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court and thus served to interrupt the tolling of time limitations pursuant to La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Francis 977 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07), , writ denied, 07-1339 (La.1/7/08), .
State v. Dright 976 So. 2d 223 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
4 Cir. 5/30/07), , this court held that Hurricane Katrina fell within the provisions of art. 579 A(2), which states in part that the time limitations of art. 578 shall be interrupted if the defendant cannot be tried "for any other cause beyond the control of the state."
State v. Ramirez 976 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Hamilton 973 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 5/30/07), , which held that the effects flowing from Hurricane Katrina served to interrupt the tolling of time limitations pursuant to La.
State v. Clay 970 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
4 Cir. 5/30/07), , that Hurricane Katrina interrupted the time delays for bringing a defendant to trial and that the two-year time limitation period imposed by La.C.Cr.P.